- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Address space of 64bit executables on 11i v2 f...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-23-2007 01:23 PM
тАО07-23-2007 01:23 PM
I think this is a bug, but is there any solution? POSIX sh (/usr/bin/sh) does not have such issue, because the "data size" is unlimited.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Tags:
- maxdsiz
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-23-2007 01:29 PM
тАО07-23-2007 01:29 PM
Re: Address space of 64bit executables on 11i v2 for Itanium
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-23-2007 01:41 PM
тАО07-23-2007 01:41 PM
Re: Address space of 64bit executables on 11i v2 for Itanium
The csh "limit datasize" is 2GB, it can not be raised to 4GB. I guess it is limited by the "maxdsiz".
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-23-2007 05:08 PM
тАО07-23-2007 05:08 PM
Re: Address space of 64bit executables on 11i v2 for Itanium
$ csh
% ulimit -a
data(kbytes) 2015464
% a.out
malloc returned 6000000000004030
maxdsiz 0x7b03a000 0x7B03A000
maxdsiz_64bit 0x4000000000 0x4000000000
>I guess it is limited by the "maxdsiz".
It probably only prints the maxdsiz value.
I don't see getrlimit64/setrlimit64 being called in any shell.
- Tags:
- scummy C shell
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-23-2007 11:07 PM
тАО07-23-2007 11:07 PM
Re: Address space of 64bit executables on 11i v2 for Itanium
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-23-2007 11:11 PM
тАО07-23-2007 11:11 PM
SolutionWhat that means here is that if the shell is *explicitly* changing the limit, the system default no longer applies -- the 64-bit child process inherits the limit of the shell. Check to make sure the customer hasn't got a .profile statement or other means that invokes a limit in the 32-bit shell which causes that lower limit to propagate to the child.
- Tags:
- rlimit
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-24-2007 01:33 AM
тАО07-24-2007 01:33 AM
Re: Address space of 64bit executables on 11i v2 for Itanium
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-24-2007 01:40 AM
тАО07-24-2007 01:40 AM