- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Migrtd lun from v2 to v3 , huge perfmnce issue
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-17-2014 11:48 AM
тАО06-17-2014 11:48 AM
After which we are facing tremendous iops bottleneck at filesystem level....When we create a new filesystem same batch job runs fine in same load conditions , but exstg filesystem simply chokes during load condtns.
Will fsadm -e help us , its 5.01 fs that we have
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-17-2014 02:06 PM
тАО06-17-2014 02:06 PM
Re: Migrtd lun from v2 to v3 , huge perfmnce issue
A reorganize of the file system MIGHT help, but I kind of doubt it. I would think that you would have seen the same performance issues on the 11iv2 server if that were the case.
It is possible, I think it is a remote possibility, that a new file system is using a newer file system layout version. You can check this with the 'fstyp -v' command and specify the raw logical volume name. See my examples below.
For example:
My /opt file system (/dev/vg00/lvol7):
# fstyp -v /dev/vg00/rlvol7
vxfs
version: 6
f_bsize: 8192
f_frsize: 8192
f_blocks: 1671168
f_bfree: 760687
f_bavail: 754745
f_files: 293056
f_ffree: 190144
f_favail: 190144
f_fsid: 1073807370
f_basetype: vxfs
f_namemax: 254
f_magic: a501fcf5
f_featurebits: 0
f_flag: 16
f_fsindex: 10
f_size: 1671168
# bdf /opt
Filesystem kbytes used avail %used Mounted on
/dev/vg00/lvol7 13369344 7283848 6038000 55% /opt
You can upgrade the file system layout of a VxFS filesystem with the vxupgrade command while the file system is still online (I would probably shut down any applications or databases though):
# vxupgrade -n 7 /opt
# fstyp -v /dev/vg00/rlvol7
vxfs
version: 7
f_bsize: 8192
f_frsize: 8192
f_blocks: 1671168
f_bfree: 760546
f_bavail: 754605
f_files: 293024
f_ffree: 190112
f_favail: 190112
f_fsid: 1073807370
f_basetype: vxfs
f_namemax: 254
f_magic: a501fcf5
f_featurebits: 0
f_flag: 16
f_fsindex: 10
f_size: 1671168
It is now layout version 7.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-19-2014 12:48 AM
тАО06-19-2014 12:48 AM
Re: Migrtd lun from v2 to v3 , huge perfmnce issue
Hi Patrick ,
You were spot on .
We were struggling for the past 90 days with this issue.
We tried all probabilities , today we would be implementing your VALUABLE suggestion for all of our DB luns.
We always were working on test servers with new filesystem v 7 , the same model as of prodcution ie rx2800 i4 and were getting performance , but we were simply thinking that it could be strorage issue , mayb kernel params, tried everything in production.
But now lets hope for the best.
Will update you tomorrow .
Thanks again.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО07-01-2014 12:55 AM