- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- >
- "cxx v.7.1-006" vs. "ISO/IEC 14882:2003" and "C++0...
Operating System - Tru64 Unix
1756751
Members
3473
Online
108852
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
10-30-2008 10:14 AM
10-30-2008 10:14 AM
"cxx v.7.1-006" vs. "ISO/IEC 14882:2003" and "C++0x"
Hi all,
Which is the current status for the "cxx" compiler ("Compaq C++ V7.1-006") in what regards to ISO standards compliance?.
It seems the compiler must have been launched in 2005.
But the documentation says it is based on ISO/IEC 14882:1998.
It does not mention the updated standard, ISO/IEC 14882:2003.
------------------------------------
If we use the strict conformance switch for the compiler ( -std strict_ansi_errors ),
is it checking for the 1993 standard or for the updated one (2003) ?.
------------------------------------
And then ...
(based on the known current status for the future standard Draft papers )
If we use the default switch for the compiler ( -std ansi ), i.e. "ANSI extensions",
How does it correlate with the recogniced extensions for the future standard ISO/IEC 14882:2009 ?.
I mean:
Will some of this extensions also be recogniced in ISO/IEC 14882:2009 ?.
Which will not?.
TIA,
Javier.
Which is the current status for the "cxx" compiler ("Compaq C++ V7.1-006") in what regards to ISO standards compliance?.
It seems the compiler must have been launched in 2005.
But the documentation says it is based on ISO/IEC 14882:1998.
It does not mention the updated standard, ISO/IEC 14882:2003.
------------------------------------
If we use the strict conformance switch for the compiler ( -std strict_ansi_errors ),
is it checking for the 1993 standard or for the updated one (2003) ?.
------------------------------------
And then ...
(based on the known current status for the future standard Draft papers )
If we use the default switch for the compiler ( -std ansi ), i.e. "ANSI extensions",
How does it correlate with the recogniced extensions for the future standard ISO/IEC 14882:2009 ?.
I mean:
Will some of this extensions also be recogniced in ISO/IEC 14882:2009 ?.
Which will not?.
TIA,
Javier.
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP