- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - OpenVMS
- >
- Re: Monitoring network, bandwidth
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 11:02 AM
08-28-2007 11:02 AM
Re: Monitoring network, bandwidth
I would be interested in the tools you have to collect data. Once you collect it, how are you using it?
Jon
P.S. is MohitAnchlia still reading this thread?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
08-28-2007 11:56 PM - last edited on 05-17-2021 10:08 PM by Ramya_Heera
08-28-2007 11:56 PM - last edited on 05-17-2021 10:08 PM by Ramya_Heera
Re: Monitoring network, bandwidth
John,
It was a long journey; I started off building an automation layer (in DCL) for an old DEC product (NMCC) largely as it lacked any ability to 'autodiscover' (as it came to be known). This was mostly via DECnet phase IV using NCP commands then parsing out the responses and eventually placing it all in an RDB database. Once I hit about 30,000 lines it was clear that DCL was not the best route to go (I can be a bit slow at times). I then started converting this all to macro and eventually designed and mostly built a standalone NMS that included both DECnets (NICE and CMIP) SCS, IP(SNMP), IPX/SPX, LAT and other protocols that were around then.
As far as examples go, I released the macro version of this to the Freeware (v5 I think) and it is there under EMU. If you want the DCL. let me know and I'll zip it up and send it.
In terms of usefulness, given a faily extensive phase IV network, the DCL programs will find all the nodes and document all characteristics in an RDB database. There is the begining of a performance management module that captured the available counters, did some rudimentary arithmetic and alerted the more obvious problems but it was clear this was not the best approach.
The macro version is similar except it will chase down all nodes on more protocols and document them in RMS files. DO NOT run this on the internet. I made this mistake once and it atempted to document the entire thing! Once it found some 15,000 nodes (of which maybe a third responded to the SNMP requests for info), the files started to get rather big. Now, doing this is probably a good way to get denied.
We've probably beaten this one to death as much as is needed publicly. If you want more (I can happily go on for days ...) sent to my email.
Regards
Paul
PS. Rob: not so much disagreeing as looking at it from a different angle.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »