- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Switching and Routing
- >
- Aruba & ProVision-based
- >
- Re: Native VLAN question between HP 5412zl and Cis...
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2013 10:52 AM
тАО05-21-2013 10:52 AM
Native VLAN question between HP 5412zl and Cisco 6506
I am attempting to move the "Native" (Cisco Term), Untagged (HP Term) from VLAN 1 to VLAN 700.
I have a Trunk "TRK1" on the HP aggregating 8 Gig Interfaces together connectng to an EtherChannel on the Cisco 6506 which is also aggregating 8 Gig Interfaces together. Everything was working fine when I first stood everything up using VLAN 1 as the Untagged / NATIVE Vlan. (Yes, I know, why did you change it - another story).
I thought it would be very easy to change the NATIVE / Untagged VLAN but I am running into issues.
On the Cisco switch, I am receiving no events; but the HP 5412zl running verson K.15.10.0009, I am constantly receiving events.
Here is what I have configured on the Cisco Side....
!
interface Port-channel5
description CO22ZNBCRK1SW1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,5,300,500
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
!
CO22DCWCRK1SW1#sho int port-channel 5 trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Po5 on 802.1q trunking 1
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Po5 1,5,300,500
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Po5 1,5,300,500
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Po5 1,5,300,500
Per this output, I am using VLAN 1; however, the HP thinks differently.
Here are the events I am recieving on the HP Switch...
I 05/21/13 18:19:40 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F20(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/8(VID 700)(363)
I 05/21/13 18:19:44 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F18(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/7(VID 700)(363)
I 05/21/13 18:19:44 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F16(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/6(VID 700)(363)
I 05/21/13 18:19:44 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F10(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/3(VID 700)(363)
I 05/21/13 18:19:45 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F12(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/4(VID 700)(363)
I 05/21/13 18:19:52 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F6(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/1(VID 700)(362)
I 05/21/13 18:19:57 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F14(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/5(VID 700)(362)
I 05/21/13 18:19:58 00828 lldp: PVID mismatch on port F8(VID 1)with peer device port Gi4/2(VID 700)(362)
Here is configuration snippets from the HP 5412zl
trunk F6,F8,F10,F12,F14,F16,F18,F20 trk1 trunk
VLAN ID : 1
Name : DEFAULT_VLAN
Status : Port-based
Voice : No
Jumbo : No
Port Information Mode Unknown VLAN Status
---------------- -------- ------------ ----------
Trk1 Untagged Learn Up
I tried calling HP Technical Support and was told I must use VLAN 1 as the Untagged VLAN. I don't believe this is true because I am using VLAN 700 between an HP 2910 and the same HP 6506 and have no issues. The only difference is there are no aggregating ports.
I am thinking I either need to reboot the HP Switch or make the changes on the HP end (Far Side) moving to VLAN 700 as the Untagged VLAN, shutting down the port channel on the Cisco Side, make the change on the Cisco side and bring up the port channel.
Does anyone have other suggestions?
Thanks in advance...
- Tags:
- VLAN
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2013 01:22 PM
тАО05-21-2013 01:22 PM
Re: Native VLAN question between HP 5412zl and Cisco 6506
Hi lagp,
If the messages are correct, you have changed the native VLAN on the HP end without changing it on the Cisco end. (The Cisco config you've posted needs "switchport trunk native vlan 700".)
Are you actually seeing any poor performance or other faults on those ports? Those messages are only from LLDP, and i'm not sure if the Cisco 6500s support this - some of their lower-end switches don't. If you search these forums you should find a few posts indicating that they show up sometimes even if your configuration is correct.
You're absolutely right that you can change the native/untagged VLAN id from 1 to something else, and as long as you have checked that you have the correct tagging on both ends it is safe to ignore the LLDP PVID mismatch errors. In my experience (on older firmware versions) rebooting won't solve anything.
Paul
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2013 01:28 PM
тАО05-21-2013 01:28 PM
Re: Native VLAN question between HP 5412zl and Cisco 6506
In that case it looks like the message was correct and matching up the VLAN tagging fixed it.
Paul
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-21-2013 06:46 PM
тАО05-21-2013 06:46 PM
Re: Native VLAN question between HP 5412zl and Cisco 6506
It looks like your Cisco switch is in a state. I would down all the ports, including the trunk port, then bring them back up. It shouldn't take a reboot.
That said, I think your idea of using VLAN700 as your native VLAN is fine. In fact, you should be encourage to eliminate VLAN1.
Here's something to remember:
Cisco *always* has a native VLAN on a .1q trunk. Unless it is specified, it will be VLAN1 by default.
Procurve can have a .1q trunk with *no* native (untagged) VLAN. It's optional. I prefer to not use one.
On a Cisco-Procurve trunk, you define your native VLAN on the Cisco side and match that to an untagged VLAN on the Procurve side.
If you've been mucking around with this and the switches are having an issue, the problem won't be your actual .1q config (which is pretty simple L2 frame-formatting), more likely the link aggregation (which is more complex). Delete the trunk ports and re-create them if disable/enable doesn't work.