- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Cisco IVR Existing Fabric
HPE EVA Storage
1752806
Members
5717
Online
108789
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Discussions
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-01-2009 08:18 PM
04-01-2009 08:18 PM
Cisco IVR Existing Fabric
Hi All,
We have a Cisco 9506 switch with a single VSAN (VSAN101). The switch has the enterprise package license and we're looking to implement IVR. I am familiar with IVR and have deployed it in the past, however, this scenario is a bit different. We're adding a financials server which needs to be completely isolated from all of the other servers, but still needs access to a storage array that resides on VSAN101. When I've deployed IVR in the past, I've always allocated a VSAN which included the storage devices to be shared via IVR. In this situation, I don't have that luxury. Does anyone see an issue with creating a VSAN (Let's say VSAN102), adding the Financial's HBA port, then create an IVR-VSAN which will include the Financial's HBA as well as the storage ports from VSAN101? We're using IVR-NAT and auto mode, I won'te be using AFID since it is a single switch and VSAN IDs are unique.
Any thoughts or suggestions are greatly appreciated?
Thanks!
-Heather
We have a Cisco 9506 switch with a single VSAN (VSAN101). The switch has the enterprise package license and we're looking to implement IVR. I am familiar with IVR and have deployed it in the past, however, this scenario is a bit different. We're adding a financials server which needs to be completely isolated from all of the other servers, but still needs access to a storage array that resides on VSAN101. When I've deployed IVR in the past, I've always allocated a VSAN which included the storage devices to be shared via IVR. In this situation, I don't have that luxury. Does anyone see an issue with creating a VSAN (Let's say VSAN102), adding the Financial's HBA port, then create an IVR-VSAN which will include the Financial's HBA as well as the storage ports from VSAN101? We're using IVR-NAT and auto mode, I won'te be using AFID since it is a single switch and VSAN IDs are unique.
Any thoughts or suggestions are greatly appreciated?
Thanks!
-Heather
1 REPLY 1
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
04-03-2009 11:30 AM
04-03-2009 11:30 AM
Re: Cisco IVR Existing Fabric
In my mind, the answer would hinge on *who* you are trying to satisfy the "completely isolated" requirement to. In my mind, simply having no other server in the same zone as your financial's server should suffice. However, if your internal auditor has started reading the documentation, maybe they want all measures taken.
I'm not sure what exactly what you are trying to accomplish, but I would be more concerned about the lack of the plural tense (HBA, Switch) in your SAN components.
I'm not sure what exactly what you are trying to accomplish, but I would be more concerned about the lack of the plural tense (HBA, Switch) in your SAN components.
check out evamgt.wetpaint.com and evamgt google group
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP