- Community Home
- >
- Storage
- >
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- >
- HPE EVA Storage
- >
- Re: "evaperf as" always returning 0
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-02-2010 03:17 PM
тАО06-02-2010 03:17 PM
"evaperf as" always returning 0
On one of our EVA 8100 arrays "evaperf as" always returns 0. "evaperf cs" returns the controller status just fine and the array is functioning correctly (i.e. it's not down).
Can anyone suggest why this might be? All our other arrays return the proper values for "evaperf as", as do all my other arrays on other customer sites.
Thanks!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-02-2010 03:24 PM
тАО06-02-2010 03:24 PM
Re: "evaperf as" always returning 0
Here's a screenshot. In the "evaperf cs" part the bottom 2 rows are the controllers in the EVA that won't return anything from "evaperf as". As you can see, that part is working properly.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-02-2010 05:55 PM
тАО06-02-2010 05:55 PM
Re: "evaperf as" always returning 0
Hello Chris,
I have few questions:
1. Is there any Server doing I/O operations on to this Array, for which you are getting zero values
2. What is EVA Firmware and Command View Version you are running
3. Can you please attach output of this below command:
>evaperf all -sz
Regards
Susanta
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-02-2010 07:13 PM
тАО06-02-2010 07:13 PM
Re: "evaperf as" always returning 0
1. Yes, there are hosts attached that are doing I/O operations on this array.
2. Command View 9.2, XCS 6.11 (yes I know it's old but there are reasons it hasn't been upgraded, yet).
3. Sorry no, I can't attach evaperf output to this message. :(
I did run the evaperf command you suggested though and there are whole bunch of zero values in there next to each controller ...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-03-2010 01:25 AM
тАО06-03-2010 01:25 AM
Re: "evaperf as" always returning 0
http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01461161
Solved on XCS 6200.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-03-2010 01:17 PM
тАО06-03-2010 01:17 PM
Re: "evaperf as" always returning 0
Yeah I found that article too - I'm running CV EVA 9.1 though (even though I said 9.2 in a previous post - sorry susanta).
For that reason I ignored the advisory as it didn't match this particular configuration.
I know that this version of XCS has a number of bugs though and that we should upgrade ASAP (it's scheduled for approximately 2 weeks away).
Hopefully that fixes it ...