- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: Trying to get a 2nd opinion on determining how...
Operating System - HP-UX
1756974
Members
1755
Online
108857
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Go to solution
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-09-2009 05:59 PM
тАО06-09-2009 05:59 PM
Aloha Great HP Guru(s),
I'm getting reports of a sluggish HP, and I instinctively issue the TOP command to see what's going on under the hood. My eyes read in the CPU USER column and the top 2 processes under %WCPU and %CPU and I get the nagging feeling that my 'runcbl' program has run away to someplace that I can't follow... I'm thinking these two processes are totally destroying the performance profile of this sleek and powerful machine. What say you?
v/r,
Chris Elmore
Load averages: 2.04, 2.05, 2.05
213 processes: 169 sleeping, 44 running
Cpu states:
CPU LOAD USER NICE SYS IDLE BLOCK SWAIT INTR SSYS
0 2.04 99.2% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2.03 99.6% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
--- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
avg 2.04 99.4% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Memory: 8067616K (3025300K) real, 10831268K (5615644K) virtual, 619680K free Pa
ge# 1/18
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
1 ? 8701 oracle 241 20 55820K 4676K run 71028:02 97.41 97.24 runcbl
0 ? 29710 oracle 241 20 55436K 4292K run 39521:10 97.32 97.15 runcbl
1 ? 22607 oracle 152 20 60400K 11860K run 10:17 1.13 1.13 webcached
1 ? 919 oracle 154 20 119M 7804K sleep 0:00 1.37 0.87 frmweb
0 ? 52 root 152 20 6984K 6208K run 1638:12 0.81 0.81 vxfsd
1 ? 22608 oracle 152 20 827M 255M run 0:57 0.77 0.77 java
1 ? 22249 oracle 152 20 440M 168M run 7:54 0.55 0.55 emagent
1 ? 22610 oracle 152 20 325M 107M run 0:42 0.51 0.51 java
0 ? 26814 hpsmh 152 20 55692K 16272K run 0:02 0.51 0.51 httpd
1 ? 22612 oracle 152 20 609M 86096K run 0:42 0.46 0.46 rwserver
I'm getting reports of a sluggish HP, and I instinctively issue the TOP command to see what's going on under the hood. My eyes read in the CPU USER column and the top 2 processes under %WCPU and %CPU and I get the nagging feeling that my 'runcbl' program has run away to someplace that I can't follow... I'm thinking these two processes are totally destroying the performance profile of this sleek and powerful machine. What say you?
v/r,
Chris Elmore
Load averages: 2.04, 2.05, 2.05
213 processes: 169 sleeping, 44 running
Cpu states:
CPU LOAD USER NICE SYS IDLE BLOCK SWAIT INTR SSYS
0 2.04 99.2% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
1 2.03 99.6% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
--- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
avg 2.04 99.4% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Memory: 8067616K (3025300K) real, 10831268K (5615644K) virtual, 619680K free Pa
ge# 1/18
CPU TTY PID USERNAME PRI NI SIZE RES STATE TIME %WCPU %CPU COMMAND
1 ? 8701 oracle 241 20 55820K 4676K run 71028:02 97.41 97.24 runcbl
0 ? 29710 oracle 241 20 55436K 4292K run 39521:10 97.32 97.15 runcbl
1 ? 22607 oracle 152 20 60400K 11860K run 10:17 1.13 1.13 webcached
1 ? 919 oracle 154 20 119M 7804K sleep 0:00 1.37 0.87 frmweb
0 ? 52 root 152 20 6984K 6208K run 1638:12 0.81 0.81 vxfsd
1 ? 22608 oracle 152 20 827M 255M run 0:57 0.77 0.77 java
1 ? 22249 oracle 152 20 440M 168M run 7:54 0.55 0.55 emagent
1 ? 22610 oracle 152 20 325M 107M run 0:42 0.51 0.51 java
0 ? 26814 hpsmh 152 20 55692K 16272K run 0:02 0.51 0.51 httpd
1 ? 22612 oracle 152 20 609M 86096K run 0:42 0.46 0.46 rwserver
"Life is love and love is life"
Solved! Go to Solution.
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-09-2009 06:25 PM
тАО06-09-2009 06:25 PM
Solution
You've pretty much hit the nail on the head!
These processes
1 ? 8701 oracle 241 20 55820K 4676K run 71028:02 97.41 97.24 runcbl
0 ? 29710 oracle 241 20 55436K 4292K run 39521:10 97.32 97.15 runcbl
are using LOTS of CPU and have accumulated LOTS of CPU.
These processes
1 ? 8701 oracle 241 20 55820K 4676K run 71028:02 97.41 97.24 runcbl
0 ? 29710 oracle 241 20 55436K 4292K run 39521:10 97.32 97.15 runcbl
are using LOTS of CPU and have accumulated LOTS of CPU.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-09-2009 06:33 PM
тАО06-09-2009 06:33 PM
Re: Trying to get a 2nd opinion on determining how far my process has 'runaway' on me.
Aloha Patrick,
We've crossed paths before on the ITRC and you've never failed me... neither THEN, nor NOW. Thanks for confirming my issue so quickly, that pretty much cements what I need to do to fix it. Please have a great day my friend.
:-)
v/r,
Chris Elmore
We've crossed paths before on the ITRC and you've never failed me... neither THEN, nor NOW. Thanks for confirming my issue so quickly, that pretty much cements what I need to do to fix it. Please have a great day my friend.
:-)
v/r,
Chris Elmore
"Life is love and love is life"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-09-2009 06:34 PM
тАО06-09-2009 06:34 PM
Re: Trying to get a 2nd opinion on determining how far my process has 'runaway' on me.
Patrick Wallek is the man!
"Life is love and love is life"
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP