- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- Re: bdf vs. df -k
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-22-2001 06:11 AM
тАО02-22-2001 06:11 AM
profx / # df -k /home
/home (/dev/vg00/lvol8) :
39883 total allocated
18302 free allocated Kb
21581 used allocated Kb 54 % allocation used
profx / # bdf /home
Filesystem kbytes used avail %used Mounted on
/dev/vg00/lvol8 40960 21581 18302 54% /home
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-22-2001 06:37 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-22-2001 06:39 AM
тАО02-22-2001 06:39 AM
Re: bdf vs. df -k
'df -t' will report the minfree %
Dan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-22-2001 07:38 AM
тАО02-22-2001 07:38 AM
Re: bdf vs. df -k
However, everything I have read says that the minfree is approx. 10%. When I do a df -t most of my file systems show 2% or less. ???
hp-ux 11.0 jfs fsprofx
/ # bdf /ora_db9
Filesystem kbytes used avail %used Mounted on
/dev/vg_emc9/lv_oradb9
113250304 89243128 23819680 79% /ora_db9
profx / # df -k /ora_db9
/ora_db9 (/dev/vg_emc9/lv_oradb9) : 113062808 total allocated Kb
23819680 free allocated Kb
89243128 used allocated Kb
78 % allocation used
profx / # df -t /ora_db9
/ora_db9 (/dev/vg_emc9/lv_oradb9): 47639360 blocks 750216 i-nodes
226500608 total blocks 750272 total i-nodes
178486256 used blocks 56 used i-nodes
0 percent minfree
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-22-2001 07:53 AM
тАО02-22-2001 07:53 AM
Re: bdf vs. df -k
But minfree is only relevant with hfs filesystems....
You may try 'fstyp -v /dev/vg??/lvol??' as this will report the most accurate figures.
Best regards,
Dan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-22-2001 08:50 AM
тАО02-22-2001 08:50 AM
Re: bdf vs. df -k
I cannot find any info that specifies anything other than 10%. But the df -t command shows 0-2%. Any info. on vxfs??
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО02-22-2001 09:13 AM
тАО02-22-2001 09:13 AM
Re: bdf vs. df -k
If you look at the 'df' manpage, it says (generic) right on the top.
My understanding of this is that 'df' isn't really tuned to report accurate figures with 'non standard' (sic) filesystems layout like vxfs.
I'm not really sure that the Berkeley version is really tuned either. There are some warnings on the manpage as well.
As 'fstyp -v /dev/vg??/lvol??' reads from the superblock, this will definitely be accurate.
One of its advantage, besides this, is the ability to report that info from mounted or umounted filesystems.
Best regards,
Dan