- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- fsck - invalid super block
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 04:08 AM
тАО05-06-2005 04:08 AM
# fsck -F vxfs -o full /dev/dsk/c0t4d0
invalid super-block
search for auxiliary super-block? (ynq)y
vxfs fsck: read failure at 589824
I have tried 3 other super blocks that I have read in the forums that are basically default but same issue.
As well, we do not have the sbtab file anywhere on the server. I thought this is created by default when you newfs a file system???
So we did a newfs on the system and when we try the same command we get the same error..
But, if I just run:
# fsck /dev/dsk/c0t4d0
fsck: /etc/default/fs is used for determining the file system type
** /dev/dsk/c0t4d0
** Last Mounted on
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
2 files, 0 icont, 9 used, 4103189 free (13 frags, 512897 blocks)
Everything checks out ok.
What are we missing???
Thanks for the help.
Solved! Go to Solution.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 05:42 AM
тАО05-06-2005 05:42 AM
SolutionI've always run it on a filesystem.
fs I thought stood for filesystem.
I'm not saying you can't do what you are doing, it just seems unusual.
You may have a problem with your disk. Or there may be something on it that prevents fsck from udnerstanding it.
At this point, I'd use mstm,cstm or xstm and test that disk thoroughly. Something is wrong with it and it needs to be fixed or replaced.
pvdisplay -v /dev/dsk/c0t4d0
maybe rdsk, I get confused.
See whats on it and then make arrangements to back it allup.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 07:42 AM
тАО05-06-2005 07:42 AM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
I can not do a pvdisplay:
# ioscan -funC disk
disk 1 10/0.4.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE SEAGATE ST34371W
/dev/dsk/c0t4d0 /dev/rdsk/c0t4d0
Also, when I run cstm, I get an error:
Waiting to obtain host information from the local host shelby.mts.mb.ca.
The diagnostic daemon "diagmond" may have been started recently and is busy
building the device map.
If this message persists for a long time, it is possible that either the
diagnostic daemon is not running, or that networking is improperly configured.
The networking configuration can be verified by comparing 'nslookup `hostname`'
with the output of ifconfig of the LANs identified by lanscan.
But, everything looks correct!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 07:55 AM
тАО05-06-2005 07:55 AM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
This command only makes sense if you are testing a filesystem using whole-disk allocation. Whole disk is almost never used anymore and especially when you also mention pvcreate, your test makes no sense.
Now this would make sense:
fsck -F vxfs -o full /dev/vg02/lvol1
assuming /dev/vg02/lvol1 houses an vxfs filesystem.
Now, if you do want to test a disk for errors, this makes more sense:
dd if=/dev/rdsk/c0t4d0 bs=64k of=/dev/null
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 08:00 AM
тАО05-06-2005 08:00 AM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
# dd if=/dev/rdsk/c0t4d0 bs=64k of=/dev/null
dd read error: I/O error
9+0 records in
9+0 records out
Does not tell me alot...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 08:02 AM
тАО05-06-2005 08:02 AM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 10:40 AM
тАО05-06-2005 10:40 AM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
Say a prayer for it, if you do that sort of thing, and figure out which one is dead. Then arrange a hardware service call to replace it.
If possible, get the disk out of the volume group its in with vgreduce. At this point it might still work.
Still could be a cable issue, but seems the disk is kinda gone.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-06-2005 01:40 PM
тАО05-06-2005 01:40 PM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
You'll have to backup any other lvols on this disk, remove the disk from the volume group, replace it, then add the new disk back into the volume group, recreate the lvols and restore your data.
Bill Hassell, sysadmin
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-08-2005 08:03 PM
тАО05-08-2005 08:03 PM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
Good luck.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО05-08-2005 10:01 PM
тАО05-08-2005 10:01 PM
Re: fsck - invalid super block
dear first find out block size of yur file system .
and then try to make dummy file sysrem of exact block size of yur old file system.last line of output will give you superblocks of yur file system. try it with "fsck" .you will get overcome of yur problem.