- Community Home
- >
- Networking
- >
- Legacy
- >
- Communications and Wireless
- >
- Re: Ether-Channel(Trunk) redundancy problem!!
Communications and Wireless
1755538
Members
3746
Online
108834
Solutions
Forums
Categories
Company
Local Language
юдл
back
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
юдл
back
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Blogs
Information
Community
Resources
Community Language
Language
Forums
Blogs
Topic Options
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-12-2010 12:17 PM
тАО03-12-2010 12:17 PM
Ether-Channel(Trunk) redundancy problem!!
Hi,
I have two Wireless Ethernet Bridges which are connecting our two branch offices, with HP2848 Switch at each end.For the best bandwidth utilization I have implemented Ether-Channel Trunk configuration on HP & its working,as both links are now utilized.
Problem:
If one of the links go down,traffic doesn't shift on the remaining link, & the link goes down.Pls note,by default STP was disabled on both HP switches, which I have now enabled(in RSTP moode),but still failover is not working.Following is the configuration of trunk done at each HP2848:
"speed-duplex 100-half
no lacp
trunk 43-44 Trk20 Trunk"
What could be the problem..Kindly advice!
Regards,
Tekkie123
I have two Wireless Ethernet Bridges which are connecting our two branch offices, with HP2848 Switch at each end.For the best bandwidth utilization I have implemented Ether-Channel Trunk configuration on HP & its working,as both links are now utilized.
Problem:
If one of the links go down,traffic doesn't shift on the remaining link, & the link goes down.Pls note,by default STP was disabled on both HP switches, which I have now enabled(in RSTP moode),but still failover is not working.Following is the configuration of trunk done at each HP2848:
"speed-duplex 100-half
no lacp
trunk 43-44 Trk20 Trunk"
What could be the problem..Kindly advice!
Regards,
Tekkie123
3 REPLIES 3
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-13-2010 09:38 PM
тАО03-13-2010 09:38 PM
Re: Ether-Channel(Trunk) redundancy problem!!
can you tell me what is the status of the other port on the trunk if the 1st one goes down?? is it up or down in "show interface"
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО03-15-2010 06:29 AM
тАО03-15-2010 06:29 AM
Re: Ether-Channel(Trunk) redundancy problem!!
Dear Friend!!
Regarding the Ether-channel, when one link is down,,the interface at other end is 'Up'.
Now there is one more interesting thing happening. Redundancy is working!! but only for one of the links. As I have two set of Radios(different brands), one with 10Mb/s & other with 20Mb/s throughput, when I disconnect radio connected at interface 44,the port at other end stays up, & link also stays up.
But when I disconnect radio connected at interface 43, link goes down although still port at other is stays up.
Therefore, I understand that redundncy is there, but only in case one of the pair goes down & not when the other goes down.
Hope u understand!!
Regards,
Saif.
Regarding the Ether-channel, when one link is down,,the interface at other end is 'Up'.
Now there is one more interesting thing happening. Redundancy is working!! but only for one of the links. As I have two set of Radios(different brands), one with 10Mb/s & other with 20Mb/s throughput, when I disconnect radio connected at interface 44,the port at other end stays up, & link also stays up.
But when I disconnect radio connected at interface 43, link goes down although still port at other is stays up.
Therefore, I understand that redundncy is there, but only in case one of the pair goes down & not when the other goes down.
Hope u understand!!
Regards,
Saif.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО06-04-2010 02:41 PM
тАО06-04-2010 02:41 PM
Re: Ether-Channel(Trunk) redundancy problem!!
Sorry for the late reply i just saw the topic again.
You need to configure UDLD for the switch to check on the link and if it's down it will block it and use only the other one.
The issue you are facing is because tha switch are not directly connected, they are connected to the bridges, so if the port is down on the other side the switch wont detect it since the link to the bridge is up.
here comes the role of the UDLD, it send health check packets to the other end to check the status every 5 secs, and if no reply after 4 intervals the link is blocked.
To configure it please refer to the "Management and configuration guide for the 2848 switches
Regards,
You need to configure UDLD for the switch to check on the link and if it's down it will block it and use only the other one.
The issue you are facing is because tha switch are not directly connected, they are connected to the bridges, so if the port is down on the other side the switch wont detect it since the link to the bridge is up.
here comes the role of the UDLD, it send health check packets to the other end to check the status every 5 secs, and if no reply after 4 intervals the link is blocked.
To configure it please refer to the "Management and configuration guide for the 2848 switches
Regards,
The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation.
News and Events
Support
© Copyright 2024 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP