- Community Home
- >
- Servers and Operating Systems
- >
- Operating Systems
- >
- Operating System - HP-UX
- >
- oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
Categories
Company
Local Language
Forums
Discussions
Forums
- Data Protection and Retention
- Entry Storage Systems
- Legacy
- Midrange and Enterprise Storage
- Storage Networking
- HPE Nimble Storage
Discussions
Discussions
Discussions
Forums
Forums
Discussions
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
- BladeSystem Infrastructure and Application Solutions
- Appliance Servers
- Alpha Servers
- BackOffice Products
- Internet Products
- HPE 9000 and HPE e3000 Servers
- Networking
- Netservers
- Secure OS Software for Linux
- Server Management (Insight Manager 7)
- Windows Server 2003
- Operating System - Tru64 Unix
- ProLiant Deployment and Provisioning
- Linux-Based Community / Regional
- Microsoft System Center Integration
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Discussion Boards
Community
Resources
Forums
Blogs
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 04:32 AM
тАО01-13-2005 04:32 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
I installed a rx-2600 with 800 MHz Itanium with Oracle 9.2.0.2 and about 120 users.
I installed a rp-3410 with 800 MHz PA-8800 with Oracle 9.2.0.0 and about 100 users.
Some key issues:
1. Oracle installation: 15 minutes in Itanium, 23 minutes in PA-RISC
2. Import: 50 GB base in Itanium: 2,5 hours, 45 GB in PA-Risc: 3 hours
All disks area 15K rpm, 3 GB memory in each case.
So, my conclusion is that Oracle in Itanium has more performance than in PA-Risc.
Regards,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 04:37 AM
тАО01-13-2005 04:37 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
If anyone else has any similar numbers I'd like to see them.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 04:47 AM
тАО01-13-2005 04:47 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
Julio Yamawaki, conclusion should be "comparable"
The speed of the i/o on the bus on those two systems may be different, as the system boards are different.
Based on the fact that the data loads are not the same size, the test can not conclude that either platform is faster.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 05:22 AM
тАО01-13-2005 05:22 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
I intend to do some benchmarking of our own, but I wanted to see if anyone had any data so I would know what to expect.
Thanks.
Tony
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 06:09 AM
тАО01-13-2005 06:09 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
IE: 4 X CPU RP about the same as 2 X CPU RX....
I have not seen any stats to validate this....
RGds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 06:43 AM
тАО01-13-2005 06:43 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
A recent box with (1.5 or 1.6 Ghz, 9Mb cache) Itanium can often double the performance when replacing a somewhat older PS system with the same mount of processors.
One proof point
http://www50.sap.com/benchmark/sd2tier.asp -->
All 8-way SMP, Oracle 9i, HPUX 11i. All tests in a few months time span, and by the same team so rather compareable.
Date-------SD Users---Model
01/12/2004 1240 rp4440, PA-8800 1.0 GHz
09/12/2003 1500 rx7620, Intel Itanium 2, 1.5 GHz
04/29/2004 1320 rx4640-8, 4 HP mx2 dual 1.1 GHz Itanium
http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_results.asp?orderby=hardware
07/30/03 541,674 64* HP PA-RISC 8700 875MHz
11/04/03 1,008,144 64*Intel Itanium2 1.5GHz
hth,
Hein.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 07:00 AM
тАО01-13-2005 07:00 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
It looks like an 8-way PA8800 1.0Ghz performed at par with an 8-way Intanium2 boxen when doing the SAP benchmarks:
http://www50.sap.com/benchmark/pdf/cert0104.pdf
http://www50.sap.com/benchmark/pdf/cert3704.pdf
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 07:30 AM
тАО01-13-2005 07:30 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
This is better:
4way Itanium, HPUX, RX4640
http://www50.sap.com/benchmark/pdf/cert3004.pdf
to a
8way PARISC, HPUX, RP4440
http://www50.sap.com/benchmark/pdf/cert0104.pdf
Performance very close...
Rgds...Geoff
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 07:37 AM
тАО01-13-2005 07:37 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
800 Megahertz on PA-RISC is not the same as 800 Megahertz on Itanium.
RISC has different(reduced) Instruction set.
SEP
Owner of ISN Corporation
http://isnamerica.com
http://hpuxconsulting.com
Sponsor: http://hpux.ws
Twitter: http://twitter.com/hpuxlinux
Founder http://newdatacloud.com
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
тАО01-13-2005 09:26 AM
тАО01-13-2005 09:26 AM
Re: oracle itanium vs. pa-risc performance
(I don't like it anyway. Currently at our site it's ~500/4 hppa/ipf and it's good that way.)