<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data in HPE 3PAR StoreServ Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017002#M4492</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to put VV's in a sync-relation without initial replication of the data between them. Just putting primary and secondary in a sync relation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used to do this on a IBM DS8K systems.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a primary and secondary LUN (3PAR = LUN = VV) seperatly and then did put them in a sync relation with "no copy"&amp;nbsp; param. Result was a LUN replcated to the other site without replication of the data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I see my collegues creating VV's , putting them in a remotecopygroup and this LUN's start replicating every bit from the primary to the secondary site. This (over) loads the replication links without any reasons I would say.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mvhkbc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-04T14:16:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017002#M4492</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to put VV's in a sync-relation without initial replication of the data between them. Just putting primary and secondary in a sync relation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used to do this on a IBM DS8K systems.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a primary and secondary LUN (3PAR = LUN = VV) seperatly and then did put them in a sync relation with "no copy"&amp;nbsp; param. Result was a LUN replcated to the other site without replication of the data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I see my collegues creating VV's , putting them in a remotecopygroup and this LUN's start replicating every bit from the primary to the secondary site. This (over) loads the replication links without any reasons I would say.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017002#M4492</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mvhkbc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-04T14:16:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017054#M4493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The data is &lt;U&gt;always&lt;/U&gt; replicated from the primary to the secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That being said, if you have a new (read: empty) &lt;U&gt;thin&lt;/U&gt; volume on the primary, you can either &lt;EM&gt;have&lt;/EM&gt; a similar empty &lt;U&gt;thin&lt;/U&gt; volume on the secondary system, or simply tell the secondary system what CPGs to use and it will &lt;EM&gt;create&lt;/EM&gt; a new &lt;U&gt;thin&lt;/U&gt; volume on the secondary side.&lt;BR /&gt;Whatever is in the primary &lt;EM&gt;will&lt;/EM&gt; be replicated, however you will notice there is Very Little Storage allocated to a new (primary) volume.&lt;BR /&gt;Then as stuff ("technical term") is written to the primary, that's replicated as expected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:40:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017054#M4493</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheldon Smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-05T00:40:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017267#M4502</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sheldon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correct answer , I can confirm !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've seen 7 sec to put new, empty&amp;nbsp; VV's in sync. But his was because not other VV's were in the also new created remote copy group .....&lt;BR /&gt;When we add new LUN's/VV's to an existing RCG, due to our procedures (3PAR restrictions ?) , one must stop the RCG first .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In that way we supend all other LUN's/VV's in the RCG . After starting the RCG, it took almost 12 minutes to re-sync (action taken during daylights, offive hours).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This re-sync is putting a lot of load on our replication links .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 07:49:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017267#M4502</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mvhkbc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-06T07:49:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Putting VV's in replication without initial replication of the data</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017349#M4505</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm a little surprised.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;stoprcopygroup ...&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;admitrcopyvv -createvv ...&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;startrcopygroup ...&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;At any customers &lt;U&gt;I've&lt;/U&gt; worked with in the past, this doesn't take much longer to run&amp;nbsp; than it does to type this reply, either using command line or SSMC. A little puzzled that this would take "...almost 12 minutes to re-sync".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you contacted HPE 3PAR Support?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many volumes are in the RCG, and what sort of bandwidth do you have between the remote copy targets? Perhaps the RCG could be split into multiple smaller groups?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-3par-storeserv-storage/putting-vv-s-in-replication-without-initial-replication-of-the/m-p/7017349#M4505</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheldon Smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-29T11:52:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

