<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic using a group for replication snapshots? in Array Performance and Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/using-a-group-for-replication-snapshots/m-p/6986293#M1091</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a CS1000 &amp;nbsp;and 3 older and much smaller systems -- could i combine them into a "Group" and then have my replication snapshots go to that group and then not worry about where each replication snapshot is and if it fits (all done manually)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 22:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mike_merrett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-14T22:50:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>using a group for replication snapshots?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/using-a-group-for-replication-snapshots/m-p/6986293#M1091</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a CS1000 &amp;nbsp;and 3 older and much smaller systems -- could i combine them into a "Group" and then have my replication snapshots go to that group and then not worry about where each replication snapshot is and if it fits (all done manually)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 22:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/using-a-group-for-replication-snapshots/m-p/6986293#M1091</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike_merrett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-14T22:50:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: using a group for replication snapshots?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/using-a-group-for-replication-snapshots/m-p/6986294#M1092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, that would work. A good Nimble SE or support can walk you through how to go about putting the three arrays into a single group - they are three separate "Groups" now, so the order you add them in will determine&amp;nbsp;what the ultimate remaining group is called. &amp;nbsp;Replication is Group to Group (not array to array) so your plan makes sense&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will also need to merge the&amp;nbsp;pools once the group merge is finished to set up the pools so that all the replication data just lands in the default pool. &amp;nbsp;This is all really easy to do but I'd walk through it with your SE so the final results are &amp;nbsp;what you are after - reswizzeling it to a different configuration is more than a bit harder later.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 03:58:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/using-a-group-for-replication-snapshots/m-p/6986294#M1092</guid>
      <dc:creator>jleonardini58</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-15T03:58:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

