<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is iSCSI better for performance for SQL Server? in Array Performance and Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/is-iscsi-better-for-performance-for-sql-server/m-p/6982298#M189</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven't seen anything like this for a few years - mostly because performance between in-guest, VMFS and now VVols are pretty much even. The choice now becomes&amp;nbsp;reliant on the way you wish to manage, snapshot and restore your datasets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:50:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick_Dyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-31T20:50:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is iSCSI better for performance for SQL Server?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/is-iscsi-better-for-performance-for-sql-server/m-p/6982297#M188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was asked a few years ago, and someone performed actual tests. &amp;nbsp;I'm wondering if Nimble has some benchmarks you can provide regarding the suggested in-guest iSCSI attached vs. a VMDK w/paravirtual SCSI driver? What about other scenarios?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I'm not using Nimble for replication, is there a reason to use iSCSI?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have performance numbers show me what to expect? &amp;nbsp;Multiple tests have been done on other SANs with varying setups and generally iSCSI doesn't win out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My particular environment is VMware 5.5, SQL Server 2014 (mostly) and Nimble 3.7.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/is-iscsi-better-for-performance-for-sql-server/m-p/6982297#M188</guid>
      <dc:creator>rottengeek35</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-25T21:05:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is iSCSI better for performance for SQL Server?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/is-iscsi-better-for-performance-for-sql-server/m-p/6982298#M189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I haven't seen anything like this for a few years - mostly because performance between in-guest, VMFS and now VVols are pretty much even. The choice now becomes&amp;nbsp;reliant on the way you wish to manage, snapshot and restore your datasets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:50:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/is-iscsi-better-for-performance-for-sql-server/m-p/6982298#M189</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nick_Dyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-31T20:50:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is iSCSI better for performance for SQL Server?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/is-iscsi-better-for-performance-for-sql-server/m-p/6982299#M190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my plan is to try replacing the iSCSI drives with VMDKs attached with paravirtual SCSI drivers on one of our high I/O test SQL Servers and see if there is any change.&amp;nbsp; Since these would be dedicated to SQL, would I still choose the SQL Performance plan?&amp;nbsp; I'm just replacing Data, Log and tempdb LUNS, moving corresponding files over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 15:59:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/is-iscsi-better-for-performance-for-sql-server/m-p/6982299#M190</guid>
      <dc:creator>rottengeek35</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-10T15:59:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

