<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance Results in Array Performance and Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/performance-results/m-p/6984229#M664</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to share the details with anyone else wanting to know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Back when we first installed out CS220 in March 2012 I ran a bunch of SQLIO test's against the Nimble CS220 our Dell MD3000i SAN and local SSD storage.&amp;nbsp; Just testing using SQLIO with 4k size.&amp;nbsp; I varied the Windows disk formating size to just see the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guess I can't post iFrames so here is a link to the PDF's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=2BBABCE10E47D6E1!4969&amp;amp;authkey=!ABp4fEhUQqR5F1c"&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Original Nimble Test Results&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also just ran some tests today before we implemented the 0 byte settings.&amp;nbsp; This is in reference to &lt;A href="https://community.hpe.com/thread/1107"&gt;Importance of path change settings in VMware&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; and &lt;A __default_attr="1215" __jive_macro_name="document" class="jive_macro_document jive_macro" href="https://community.hpe.com/"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=2BBABCE10E47D6E1!4970&amp;amp;authkey=!ABXu1_Wmj8eMCAY"&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Byte Change Results&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone else has their testing details out there it would be cool too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;†Shawn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 20:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>eysfilm136</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-03T20:16:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Results</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/performance-results/m-p/6984229#M664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to share the details with anyone else wanting to know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Back when we first installed out CS220 in March 2012 I ran a bunch of SQLIO test's against the Nimble CS220 our Dell MD3000i SAN and local SSD storage.&amp;nbsp; Just testing using SQLIO with 4k size.&amp;nbsp; I varied the Windows disk formating size to just see the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guess I can't post iFrames so here is a link to the PDF's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=2BBABCE10E47D6E1!4969&amp;amp;authkey=!ABp4fEhUQqR5F1c"&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Original Nimble Test Results&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also just ran some tests today before we implemented the 0 byte settings.&amp;nbsp; This is in reference to &lt;A href="https://community.hpe.com/thread/1107"&gt;Importance of path change settings in VMware&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; and &lt;A __default_attr="1215" __jive_macro_name="document" class="jive_macro_document jive_macro" href="https://community.hpe.com/"&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;&lt;A href="https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=2BBABCE10E47D6E1!4970&amp;amp;authkey=!ABXu1_Wmj8eMCAY"&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;Byte Change Results&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anyone else has their testing details out there it would be cool too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;†Shawn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 20:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/performance-results/m-p/6984229#M664</guid>
      <dc:creator>eysfilm136</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-03T20:16:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Results</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/performance-results/m-p/6984230#M665</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for sharing those results Shawn, some good numbers there! Interesting to see the massive difference when changing the multi-path policies. I've never yet tried the zero-byte configuration so will also try this and compare :-)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ben&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 03:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/performance-results/m-p/6984230#M665</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenLoveday</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-05T03:25:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Results</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/performance-results/m-p/6984231#M666</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Very interesting set of results indeed, thank you for posting!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 0 bytes parameter really does make a difference, will share these with my peers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 21:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/performance-results/m-p/6984231#M666</guid>
      <dc:creator>benwatson87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-05T21:11:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

