<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Chance of increased snap limits? in Array Performance and Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984346#M687</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So here's a neat command to use in order to better understand limits:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #ffeb25; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.760784); font-size: 14px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Nimble OS $ group --list_limits&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With that, you can get a sense of an object's limits within&amp;nbsp;various scopes (snapshots per volume, snapshots per group, snapshots per pool, snapcolls per volcoll, etc.) along with where you stand with regards to that limit. &amp;nbsp;You'll see what your current usage is, what the warning threshold is, and what the actual maximum is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jcates98</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-12T13:10:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Chance of increased snap limits?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984345#M686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using replication between Nimble arrays on NImbleOS 3.7. The default Volume Collection replica count is two. Seeing that Veeam is going to manage our replicas, I thought I would be clever and set the retention on the arrays to "999". After setting a few Volume Collections to 999 the GUI started throwing this error:&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG alt="Error" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.hpe.com/legacyfs/online/4745_Screen Shot 2017-06-11 at 3.43.15 PM.png" style="width: 620px; height: 438px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which leads me to believe that there are quotas under the covers I am not aware of. From some Googling I found some old 2.x articles saying there is a 10,000 snap limit which seems like what I ran into in 3.x. &amp;nbsp;A) Are there plans to raise this limit? I'd love to keep a week's worth of hourly backups across all volumes. Let's say 100 volumes x 168 snaps = &amp;nbsp;~17000 snaps. C) It appears the per volume collection limit is a hard set 150 snaps. Can this be changed or will it be increased in future releases? An hourly snap for a week is at least 168. An every 15 minute snap (hooray super low RPO requirements &lt;IMG src="https://community.hpe.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/sad.png" /&gt;) for a week puts us at 672 snaps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure feels like 100k snap limit and 1000/volume collection is something to shoot for if not already on the roadmap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2017 19:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984345#M686</guid>
      <dc:creator>bubbagump41</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-11T19:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chance of increased snap limits?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984346#M687</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So here's a neat command to use in order to better understand limits:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="color: #ffeb25; background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.760784); font-size: 14px;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Nimble OS $ group --list_limits&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With that, you can get a sense of an object's limits within&amp;nbsp;various scopes (snapshots per volume, snapshots per group, snapshots per pool, snapcolls per volcoll, etc.) along with where you stand with regards to that limit. &amp;nbsp;You'll see what your current usage is, what the warning threshold is, and what the actual maximum is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 13:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984346#M687</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcates98</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-12T13:10:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chance of increased snap limits?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984347#M688</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's worth noting that snapshot limits have been significantly increased since that old document you found. On some arrays such as the AFAs we support 500K snapshots per array!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984347#M688</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nick_Dyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-16T08:41:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chance of increased snap limits?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984348#M689</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe more explanation is needed. There is a concept of high and low retention per volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The snapshot limit of Nimble OS 2.3.x is at it's maximum over 150,000 snapshots.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Low retention is 150 or less. High retention is over 150 until 1000. Volume count limit on 2.3.x is 1024.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For high retention, you may only have up to 10 volumes with up to 1000 snapshots each.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For low retention, you could have remaining up to 1014 volumes with 150 snapshots.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1014 * 150 + 10 * 1,000= 152,100 + 10,000 = 162,100 snapshots are possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The limits in the command described above would not be as verbose as the Administration Guide, which is available on InfoSight. I would encourage to recheck the Administration Guide for each Nimble OS newer than 2.3.x for it's limits and or considerations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 14:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984348#M689</guid>
      <dc:creator>milovanov88</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-22T14:04:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Chance of increased snap limits?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984349#M690</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is very helpful. The way it is presented now it seems like the GUI is saying... high retention, ZOMG we're all going to die!!!! Rather than a kind indicator just to let you judge in the scheme of the universe where the snapshot limit lies. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 16:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/chance-of-increased-snap-limits/m-p/6984349#M690</guid>
      <dc:creator>bubbagump41</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-05T16:28:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

