<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Volume Example Performance question? in Array Performance and Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985093#M819</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks solid - the latency remains unchanged even when the disk I/O increased.&amp;nbsp; Keep in mind if the application is maintaining its own cache in VM Memory that will probably keep some data from being placed in SSD cache, so expect a brief ding in performance (latency) when the switch to disk occurs and initial reads are served from HDD.&amp;nbsp; After that Nimble will serve the cache worthy data from SSD and you'll be in good shape.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further tuning may be available, but I'd be surprised if you saw any significant jump in performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Valdereth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-28T19:20:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Volume Example Performance question?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985090#M816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am being asked to verify that storage volume performance was good while a VM's workload (Oracle database query) was shifted from VM memory to VM disk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There was a bug reported that caused the workload to shift to disk.&amp;nbsp; It's expected that the workload would be slower on VM disk than memory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The complaints and performance was so much slower that we were forced to reboot the server, which cleared it up and now running in VM memory again, no problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ran a performance report on our Nimble CS215 for that volume (only the one VM using it).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The slow performance was reported from March 12-15.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see more read activity in the 3/12-15 timeframe (expected when workload shifted), but do the numbers look bad?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone see anything that could cause concern?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to tell our management that if this happens again, our storage is optimal...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="nimble_2_datastore_performance.jpg" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.hpe.com/legacyfs/online/3053_nimble_2_datastore_performance.jpg" style="width: 620px; height: 752px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:42:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985090#M816</guid>
      <dc:creator>romatlo32</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-23T14:42:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Volume Example Performance question?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985091#M817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A quick glance at your graphs shows nothing wrong with storage.&amp;nbsp; Your cache hit rate stays very high and your response time stays low.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This suggests a couple avenues of investigation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;One possibility is that switching from memory, which responds in tens of microseconds, to reading from cache on the array, which responds in a hundreds of microseconds, is a big enough slowdown to cause the problem.&amp;nbsp; No matter how fast your array, it is still 10 to 100 times slower than memory.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Another possibility is that you have a problem higher in the stack than the array.&amp;nbsp; Some problem with the network or the way the server's iSCSI is configured is preventing you from getting more performance from the array.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;My recommendation is that you open a support call with Nimble and ask them to help you trouble-shoot the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One last question: do you have or can you produce Oracle AWR reports from the period when things ran well and the period when things did not run well?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985091#M817</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdaniel47</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-24T17:59:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Volume Example Performance question?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985092#M818</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Stephen!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will check on the AWR report and reply back, hopefully close this thread early this week.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985092#M818</guid>
      <dc:creator>romatlo32</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-27T14:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Volume Example Performance question?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985093#M819</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looks solid - the latency remains unchanged even when the disk I/O increased.&amp;nbsp; Keep in mind if the application is maintaining its own cache in VM Memory that will probably keep some data from being placed in SSD cache, so expect a brief ding in performance (latency) when the switch to disk occurs and initial reads are served from HDD.&amp;nbsp; After that Nimble will serve the cache worthy data from SSD and you'll be in good shape.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Further tuning may be available, but I'd be surprised if you saw any significant jump in performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985093#M819</guid>
      <dc:creator>Valdereth</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-28T19:20:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Volume Example Performance question?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985094#M820</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you folks for responding.&amp;nbsp; Loving this Nimble!&amp;nbsp; &lt;IMG src="https://community.hpe.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-performance-and-data/volume-example-performance-question/m-p/6985094#M820</guid>
      <dc:creator>romatlo32</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-28T19:47:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

