<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: to vPC peer or NOT vPC peer Nexus for UCS/Nimble Smart Stack. in Array Setup and Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986032#M2008</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It depends on where you want to have the Nimble connected.&amp;nbsp; We opted to connect as appliance ports on the FI.&amp;nbsp; For upstream communication to non-UCS hosts we created appliance port uplink port channels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Going the appliance port route allows you make sure you have an A/B storage path config.&amp;nbsp; If all of your storage consumers are on the UCS, it makes it even more efficient.&amp;nbsp; The only downside would be burning FI port licenses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:23:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ageiger3171</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-08T17:23:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>To vPC peer or NOT vPC peer Nexus for UCS/Nimble SmartStack</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986031#M2007</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Nimble KB doc says to vPC peer the Nexus but when working recently with a Nimble SE he recommended not to vPC peer the Nexus in order to avoid iSCSI traffic crossing the peer link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scenario would be as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;dual iSCSI subnets/VLANs (best practice according to Nimble SE).&amp;nbsp; One for FI-A and one for FI-B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;both of those VLANs of course would reside on both Nexus due to vPC requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nimble, TG-1 (iSCSI-A) conencted to Nexus 1, TG-2 (iSCSI-B) connected to Nexus 2 (not vPCd)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FI's vPC'd to each Nexus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my picture below, the yellow lines represent iSCSI-A traffic coming from FI-A.&amp;nbsp; Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="2243" alt="nimb.jpg" class="jive-image image-1" src="https://community.hpe.com/legacyfs/online/2243_nimb.jpg" style="height: auto;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986031#M2007</guid>
      <dc:creator>joshik67</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-05T17:39:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: to vPC peer or NOT vPC peer Nexus for UCS/Nimble Smart Stack.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986032#M2008</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It depends on where you want to have the Nimble connected.&amp;nbsp; We opted to connect as appliance ports on the FI.&amp;nbsp; For upstream communication to non-UCS hosts we created appliance port uplink port channels.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Going the appliance port route allows you make sure you have an A/B storage path config.&amp;nbsp; If all of your storage consumers are on the UCS, it makes it even more efficient.&amp;nbsp; The only downside would be burning FI port licenses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:23:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986032#M2008</guid>
      <dc:creator>ageiger3171</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-08T17:23:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: to vPC peer or NOT vPC peer Nexus for UCS/Nimble Smart Stack.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986033#M2009</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nimble is connected to the 2 x Nexus.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Our company best practice is to not attach storage to the FIs.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Nimble KB doc shows both methods, FI Applicance port, or to a 10G switch which is a Nexus vPC pair.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Nexus vPC pair example, they have the Nexus paired as a vPC as i mentioned in my original post.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This still would cause traffic to cross the vPC peer link.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:49:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986033#M2009</guid>
      <dc:creator>joshik67</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-08T18:49:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: to vPC peer or NOT vPC peer Nexus for UCS/Nimble Smart Stack.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986034#M2010</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could try setting up a second set of uplink port-channels from the FI and use vlan pinning to assign the storage traffic to the uplinks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On our initial Nimble implementation we were using a single subnet(1.4 days) and connecting to a Nexus 5K and having the storage traffic ride over the FI uplinks with all the other traffic.&amp;nbsp; We had a chance to do a ground up redesign over the summer and went with the appliance ports and 2 data vlans in the new implementation.&amp;nbsp; I now feel comfortable using Jumbo frames in the fabric since I only have the FI, hosts, and array to worry about.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 19:00:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/to-vpc-peer-or-not-vpc-peer-nexus-for-ucs-nimble-smartstack/m-p/6986034#M2010</guid>
      <dc:creator>ageiger3171</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-08T19:00:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

