<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Doubts on TG virtual interface from Nimble storage in Array Setup and Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/doubts-on-tg-virtual-interface-from-nimble-storage/m-p/7006710#M2207</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe you've created VLANs on the array - as the ".387" etc equates to the virtual port created for the VLAN, on the respective physical port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 15:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick_Dyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-22T15:17:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Doubts on TG virtual interface from Nimble storage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/doubts-on-tg-virtual-interface-from-nimble-storage/m-p/7006547#M2206</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Im new to Nimble storage.As per my current setup,2 ethernet physical cards &amp;amp; 2 TG physical cards are there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also im seeing so many interfaces in network option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;like tg.1.1, tg1.387, tg2.2,tg2.387 etc..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The above are virtual interfaces? Can we create a new virtual interface and point to phyical nic interface i mean tg1 or tg2?????&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Manivel R&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 10:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/doubts-on-tg-virtual-interface-from-nimble-storage/m-p/7006547#M2206</guid>
      <dc:creator>manivel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-21T10:10:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Doubts on TG virtual interface from Nimble storage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/doubts-on-tg-virtual-interface-from-nimble-storage/m-p/7006710#M2207</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe you've created VLANs on the array - as the ".387" etc equates to the virtual port created for the VLAN, on the respective physical port.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 15:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/doubts-on-tg-virtual-interface-from-nimble-storage/m-p/7006710#M2207</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nick_Dyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-22T15:17:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Doubts on TG virtual interface from Nimble storage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/doubts-on-tg-virtual-interface-from-nimble-storage/m-p/7006815#M2212</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think yes. which means if i want to use another vlan(for example 465),then i need to create a new virtual interface and then should be tagged to any one of the existing physical interface(for example tg2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am i right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 12:08:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/array-setup-and-networking/doubts-on-tg-virtual-interface-from-nimble-storage/m-p/7006815#M2212</guid>
      <dc:creator>manivel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-23T12:08:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

