<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: comparing different MSAs and disk options in MSA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/comparing-different-msas-and-disk-options/m-p/7089507#M13822</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MSA quickspecs provides a basic guidance of the IOPS that you can expect in few configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its just a guideline on what you could expect from the array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MSA 2050 quickspecs page 25:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00008276enw#" target="_blank"&gt;https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00008276enw#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MSA 1050 quickspecs page 22:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00005875enw" target="_blank"&gt;https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00005875enw&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SSD drives with performance tier will definitely give better performance. However, I cant comment on how fast the applications work from end user perspective with different configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One major difference between MSA 1050 and MSA 2050 is the number of host ports (4 for MSA 1050 and 8 for MSA 2050) which limits the number of paths and load balancing at host port level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be good to engage a pre-sales storage consultant through HPE sales team to get more appropriate answers for your queries.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 15:22:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arun_r</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-28T15:22:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>comparing different MSAs and disk options</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/comparing-different-msas-and-disk-options/m-p/7088841#M13816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm shopping for a new MSA iSCSI SAN for a VMware cluster (3 hosts only).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some questions about possible configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two SQL servers running Kronos and Great Plains, plus an Exchange 2013 server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm curious about how end users would possibly perceive the differences between the following configurations regardless of what SAN is used:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) 12 10k 600 GB drives (RAID 5) or 24 10k 600 GB drives (RAID 6)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) 2 SSD drives appropriately sized (RAID 1) and either 10 or 22 SATA drives with appropriate RAID, with tiering turned on&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) is the 1050 noticeably slower than 2050?? -- tn terms of customers' perceptions of how "fast" things are??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I ask all these questions because I'm only planning for the next 5-6 years, I expect everything to be cloudified after that....I only need 6-8 TB storage, we're presently using perhaps 3 TB of storage right now, and I'm looking for a balance of speed vs. cost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm also looking at new servers, for which I've requested the fastest possible 8-core processor that I think we can afford.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Tom&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 14:37:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/comparing-different-msas-and-disk-options/m-p/7088841#M13816</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tom Lyczko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-22T14:37:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: comparing different MSAs and disk options</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/comparing-different-msas-and-disk-options/m-p/7089507#M13822</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MSA quickspecs provides a basic guidance of the IOPS that you can expect in few configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Its just a guideline on what you could expect from the array.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MSA 2050 quickspecs page 25:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00008276enw#" target="_blank"&gt;https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00008276enw#&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MSA 1050 quickspecs page 22:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00005875enw" target="_blank"&gt;https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getdocument.aspx?docname=a00005875enw&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SSD drives with performance tier will definitely give better performance. However, I cant comment on how fast the applications work from end user perspective with different configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One major difference between MSA 1050 and MSA 2050 is the number of host ports (4 for MSA 1050 and 8 for MSA 2050) which limits the number of paths and load balancing at host port level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would be good to engage a pre-sales storage consultant through HPE sales team to get more appropriate answers for your queries.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 15:22:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/comparing-different-msas-and-disk-options/m-p/7089507#M13822</guid>
      <dc:creator>arun_r</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-28T15:22:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

