<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MSA1000 and Secure Path in MSA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa1000-and-secure-path/m-p/632055#M2048</link>
    <description>I have an MSA 1000 attached to two hosts (not a cluster) and I want to install a second HBA in each of the two hosts.  I purchased the HA kit for redudancy and I am at the point of installing Secure Path.  I've also read several horror stories here.  Do I even need secure path?  Can windows manage the second HBA without it?  What is the advatage of secure path? and finally - will I get double the throughput with two HBA's or are they strictly for failover purposes?</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dewitte64</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-03-05T11:36:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA1000 and Secure Path</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa1000-and-secure-path/m-p/632055#M2048</link>
      <description>I have an MSA 1000 attached to two hosts (not a cluster) and I want to install a second HBA in each of the two hosts.  I purchased the HA kit for redudancy and I am at the point of installing Secure Path.  I've also read several horror stories here.  Do I even need secure path?  Can windows manage the second HBA without it?  What is the advatage of secure path? and finally - will I get double the throughput with two HBA's or are they strictly for failover purposes?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa1000-and-secure-path/m-p/632055#M2048</guid>
      <dc:creator>dewitte64</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-05T11:36:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA1000 and Secure Path</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa1000-and-secure-path/m-p/632056#M2049</link>
      <description>Windows does not know how to deal with multiple paths and will configure two devices instead - not a good thing. The advantage of Secure Path is that it taps between the SCSI drivers and the file system and acts as a filter. If the active path goes down, Secure Path switches transparently to the standby path.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will not get double throughput, because the MSA1000 uses Active/Standby controllers - only one controller is doing all the work. If Secure Path requests a failover for one logical disk, all of them are failed over, because the controller roles change.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa1000-and-secure-path/m-p/632056#M2049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-06T00:57:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

