<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MSA1000 controllers with different rev and cache size in HPE MSA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa1000-controllers-with-different-rev-and-cache-size/m-p/780229#M3097</link>
    <description>Redundancy in the MSA is dependent on the controller configurations being exactly the same.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:08:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James Muell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-04-23T08:08:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA1000 controllers with different rev and cache size</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa1000-controllers-with-different-rev-and-cache-size/m-p/780227#M3095</link>
      <description>We have two MSA 1000 controllers with different revisions and probabla different cache size. Can they be in the same MSA1000?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Rutger</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 06:29:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa1000-controllers-with-different-rev-and-cache-size/m-p/780227#M3095</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rugge</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-21T06:29:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA1000 controllers with different rev and cache size</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa1000-controllers-with-different-rev-and-cache-size/m-p/780228#M3096</link>
      <description>If you want to use an active/active config, then I think the answer to your question is no.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In active/passive configuration, it may be possible, but I doubt it would be a supported configuration.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-tjh</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 08:16:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa1000-controllers-with-different-rev-and-cache-size/m-p/780228#M3096</guid>
      <dc:creator>tharrold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-22T08:16:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA1000 controllers with different rev and cache size</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa1000-controllers-with-different-rev-and-cache-size/m-p/780229#M3097</link>
      <description>Redundancy in the MSA is dependent on the controller configurations being exactly the same.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 08:08:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa1000-controllers-with-different-rev-and-cache-size/m-p/780229#M3097</guid>
      <dc:creator>James Muell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-04-23T08:08:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

