<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EVA4000 and wrong Read performance in MSA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/eva4000-and-wrong-read-performance/m-p/865213#M3564</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
in a SAN environment with EVA4000 i have found problem for I/O performance on Library Backup from SAN storage. I have done some test, the library is ok (100Mb/s) but with PAT ReadData utility the read performance on storage is very wrong (about 20Mb/s on every LUN mapped on servers).&lt;BR /&gt;
The Fault T. is Raid 5, this is the best solution for read performance..&lt;BR /&gt;
someone can give me some info for troubleshooting this problem??&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks very much&lt;BR /&gt;
Andrea&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:43:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andreag_77</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-09T05:43:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EVA4000 and wrong Read performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/eva4000-and-wrong-read-performance/m-p/865213#M3564</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
in a SAN environment with EVA4000 i have found problem for I/O performance on Library Backup from SAN storage. I have done some test, the library is ok (100Mb/s) but with PAT ReadData utility the read performance on storage is very wrong (about 20Mb/s on every LUN mapped on servers).&lt;BR /&gt;
The Fault T. is Raid 5, this is the best solution for read performance..&lt;BR /&gt;
someone can give me some info for troubleshooting this problem??&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
thanks very much&lt;BR /&gt;
Andrea&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:43:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/eva4000-and-wrong-read-performance/m-p/865213#M3564</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andreag_77</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-09T05:43:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA4000 and wrong Read performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/eva4000-and-wrong-read-performance/m-p/865214#M3565</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry for the late response but I do not regulary monitor this forum.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had a similar problem but in my case, the disk system was an EVA3000.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=971067" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=971067&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;At last, I found a possibly source of the problem. The disk system with bad performance had very little free capacity (about 5%). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- How much free capacity do you have ?&lt;BR /&gt;- Is it possible to free up some space ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If yes, create a test LUN, use the PAT tool to test performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then, free up some space, test performance again, using the same LUN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Next, delete and recreate the LUN again. Do a new performance test.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you notice any difference ?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:41:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/eva4000-and-wrong-read-performance/m-p/865214#M3565</guid>
      <dc:creator>leif halvarsson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-04T19:41:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

