<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MSA2000 single controller setup? in MSA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020646#M4273</link>
    <description>Sure it is a great idea if your looking to save money and can afford the downtime and you are routinely doing your backups.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Dual Controllers/Dual Paths will help with redundancy and will keep your systems up if you have a single point of failure but that wont help if 2 disks fail in a Raid5 Vdisk.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Martin</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Martin Smoral</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-28T13:58:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA2000 single controller setup?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020643#M4270</link>
      <description>Is it justifiable to buy a MSA2000 SAN with just one controller as mentioned as a possibility in marketing material?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We are not a bank and can live with downtime of 1/2 day etc. But data loss is not ok.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanx for any advice, documents, links etc.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020643#M4270</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Petersen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-27T13:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2000 single controller setup?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020644#M4271</link>
      <description>Yes it is. But even with two controllers it is not a good idea to do NO backups.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020644#M4271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-27T17:50:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2000 single controller setup?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020645#M4272</link>
      <description>we do daily backups, but we need a solution that does not require restore from backup if the hardware fails. Its ok to have some downtime to replace a broken controller, but no data loss is accepted. What do I really get with 2 vs. 1 controller?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:19:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020645#M4272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Petersen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-27T19:19:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2000 single controller setup?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020646#M4273</link>
      <description>Sure it is a great idea if your looking to save money and can afford the downtime and you are routinely doing your backups.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Dual Controllers/Dual Paths will help with redundancy and will keep your systems up if you have a single point of failure but that wont help if 2 disks fail in a Raid5 Vdisk.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Martin</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/msa2000-single-controller-setup/m-p/1020646#M4273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Martin Smoral</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-28T13:58:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

