<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IOPS comparing between SAN's. in MSA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5289647#M5920</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I believe HP used to recommend iometer.&lt;BR /&gt;There is also IOR which I've used occasionally.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Johan Guldmyr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-03T05:39:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IOPS comparing between SAN's.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5288987#M5919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a few SAN's and some DAS. I want to compare the speed of the new and old hardware. How can I do this? Iozone does not give the IOPS. Is there no official or general known (standard) software for benchmarking IO?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5288987#M5919</guid>
      <dc:creator>Helmut Moltke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-02T13:08:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IOPS comparing between SAN's.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5289647#M5920</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I believe HP used to recommend iometer.&lt;BR /&gt;There is also IOR which I've used occasionally.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5289647#M5920</guid>
      <dc:creator>Johan Guldmyr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-03T05:39:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IOPS comparing between SAN's.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5289651#M5922</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use most of the time IOmeter and SQLIO... Gives a good overview and idea of performance...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:44:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5289651#M5922</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bart_Heungens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-03T05:44:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IOPS comparing between SAN's.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5291701#M5927</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK, iometer is fine. It's old but gets the job done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two great articles about iometer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.xssist.com/blog/Benchmark%20using%20iometer%20on%20linux.htm"&gt;http://www.xssist.com/blog/Benchmark%20using%20iometer%20on%20linux.htm&lt;/A&gt;﻿&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.techrepublic.com/article/test-storage-system-performance-with-iometer/5735721"&gt;http://www.techrepublic.com/article/test-storage-system-performance-with-iometer/5735721&lt;/A&gt;﻿&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/msa-storage/iops-comparing-between-san-s/m-p/5291701#M5927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Helmut Moltke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-04T13:36:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

