<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MSA2012fc - paths to VMware following firmware in HPE MSA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa2012fc-paths-to-vmware-following-firmware/m-p/5396941#M6099</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm just looking to bump this. I've been down the road of following this up with VMware but kept coming back to the SAN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It does leave me nervous about how well our SAN will manage a controller failover, such as during the next firmware update.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Everything I can think of leads me to suggest this is a bug in the most recent firmware.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:43:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua Small_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-22T03:43:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA2012fc - paths to VMware following firmware</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa2012fc-paths-to-vmware-following-firmware/m-p/5378823#M6077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Last night we upgraded our MSA2012fc, (G1) from a much older firmware, to &amp;nbsp;J201R09-01.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prior to the upgrade, paths in VMware were four to each LUN. In short, each HBA on our server had a path to each controller. These were working fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Subsequent to this upgrade, each LUN appears to only list two paths. After some investigation we've noted that it's listing paths to that LUN's owner.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, we have LUN A and LUN B, owned by Controller A and Controller B respectively. If I look at the paths available for LUN A, it has one path for each HBA, to Controller A. The paths for&amp;nbsp;LUN B lists one path for each of the HBAs to Controller B.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe this is "OK" in that, in the event of a controller failure, the LUN owner will change, and VMware will notice this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My major concerns is that this appears to be a change based on a firmware update, and I'm not fully sure WHY.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ESXi servers are using VMW_SATP_ALUA and PSP_RR. I did find some posts around the G1 not supporting ALUA, but they were all using this same SATP before the upgrade, so I'm keen to avoid changing it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any assistance appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:24:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa2012fc-paths-to-vmware-following-firmware/m-p/5378823#M6077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua Small_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-01T23:24:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2012fc - paths to VMware following firmware</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa2012fc-paths-to-vmware-following-firmware/m-p/5396941#M6099</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm just looking to bump this. I've been down the road of following this up with VMware but kept coming back to the SAN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It does leave me nervous about how well our SAN will manage a controller failover, such as during the next firmware update.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Everything I can think of leads me to suggest this is a bug in the most recent firmware.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 03:43:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-msa-storage/msa2012fc-paths-to-vmware-following-firmware/m-p/5396941#M6099</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua Small_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-22T03:43:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

