<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Difference between autoloader and tape library in Automated Backup</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/automated-backup/difference-between-autoloader-and-tape-library/m-p/73390#M64</link>
    <description>From a drive standpoint, only the 1/9 supports the DLT1 drive. Both support DLT8K and HP LTO.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The 2/20 can obviously support up to two drives.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Other differences:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* The remote management (web) card is standard in the 2/20, but optional in the 1/9.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Only the 2/20 supports an internal fibre bridge.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Only the 2/20 has a configurable mailslot (0,1, or 5 slots).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* The 1/9 uses one 6-slot magazine (with 3 fixed slots). The 2/20 uses 4 5-slot magazines.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Both can be rack-mount or standalone.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Lastly, the 1/9 is called an Autoloader because it supports 'stacker' mode, which allows it to be used without a host controlling the library.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CA713937</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-03-13T23:39:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Difference between autoloader and tape library</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/automated-backup/difference-between-autoloader-and-tape-library/m-p/73389#M63</link>
      <description>Apart the storage capacity, what's the difference between a surestore autolader 1/9 and a surestore type library 2/20 ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What functionnalities appear in one model and not in the other ?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Pierre&lt;BR /&gt;
--</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 14:42:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/automated-backup/difference-between-autoloader-and-tape-library/m-p/73389#M63</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pierre Pitteloud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-13T14:42:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Difference between autoloader and tape library</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/automated-backup/difference-between-autoloader-and-tape-library/m-p/73390#M64</link>
      <description>From a drive standpoint, only the 1/9 supports the DLT1 drive. Both support DLT8K and HP LTO.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The 2/20 can obviously support up to two drives.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Other differences:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* The remote management (web) card is standard in the 2/20, but optional in the 1/9.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Only the 2/20 supports an internal fibre bridge.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Only the 2/20 has a configurable mailslot (0,1, or 5 slots).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* The 1/9 uses one 6-slot magazine (with 3 fixed slots). The 2/20 uses 4 5-slot magazines.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Both can be rack-mount or standalone.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
* Lastly, the 1/9 is called an Autoloader because it supports 'stacker' mode, which allows it to be used without a host controlling the library.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 23:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/automated-backup/difference-between-autoloader-and-tape-library/m-p/73390#M64</guid>
      <dc:creator>CA713937</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-13T23:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

