<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multi tenancy or not in HPE Morpheus Enterprise Software</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-morpheus-enterprise-software/multi-tenancy-or-not/m-p/7265368#M5244</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Yes, you can do this with Morpheus Enterprise — but no, you cannot do it with VM Essentials.&amp;nbsp;&lt;DIV&gt;Morpheus Enterprise supports &lt;STRONG&gt;true logical multi‑tenancy&lt;/STRONG&gt;, which replaces VMware folders with a &lt;STRONG&gt;stronger and cleaner model&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Your current VMware folder-based model maps cleanly to: &lt;STRONG&gt;Morpheus tenants + RBAC + shared clusters.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I would recommend to investigate into&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Tenants + Roles&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>larsber</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-22T06:56:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multi tenancy or not</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-morpheus-enterprise-software/multi-tenancy-or-not/m-p/7265259#M5242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment we are using vmware and have a rather large environment which has 30+ clusters in what we call a shared environment. we have our access setup with folders who contain the vm's for all the different customers. A customer can have vms on all 30+ clusters but can only see the vms in their specific folder.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we achieve this with morpheus enterprise as at the moment we are testing VM Essentials and it seems we cannot achieve this in Essentials.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:43:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-morpheus-enterprise-software/multi-tenancy-or-not/m-p/7265259#M5242</guid>
      <dc:creator>bkpht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-20T09:43:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi tenancy or not</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-morpheus-enterprise-software/multi-tenancy-or-not/m-p/7265368#M5244</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;Yes, you can do this with Morpheus Enterprise — but no, you cannot do it with VM Essentials.&amp;nbsp;&lt;DIV&gt;Morpheus Enterprise supports &lt;STRONG&gt;true logical multi‑tenancy&lt;/STRONG&gt;, which replaces VMware folders with a &lt;STRONG&gt;stronger and cleaner model&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Your current VMware folder-based model maps cleanly to: &lt;STRONG&gt;Morpheus tenants + RBAC + shared clusters.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;I would recommend to investigate into&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Tenants + Roles&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:56:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-morpheus-enterprise-software/multi-tenancy-or-not/m-p/7265368#M5244</guid>
      <dc:creator>larsber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-22T06:56:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi tenancy or not</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-morpheus-enterprise-software/multi-tenancy-or-not/m-p/7265373#M5245</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thnx&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 07:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-morpheus-enterprise-software/multi-tenancy-or-not/m-p/7265373#M5245</guid>
      <dc:creator>bkpht</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-22T07:38:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

