<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Lab validation of Latency benefits of Memory-Driven Flash for SQL Server in Operating System - Microsoft</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/lab-validation-of-latency-benefits-of-memory-driven-flash-for/m-p/7042480#M13382</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://innovate2value.wordpress.com/2019/04/10/cut-sql-server-latency-in-half-with-memory-driven-flash-storage/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;New information&lt;/A&gt; is available on how all-flash storage with storage class memory cache (aka 'Memory-Driven Flash') can cut system latency in half.&amp;nbsp; Recent testing details 59% latency reduction for MS SQL Server 2017 workload on 3PAR 9k with Intel Optane SSD:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://innovate2value.wordpress.com/2019/04/10/cut-sql-server-latency-in-half-with-memory-driven-flash-storage/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&amp;lt;link to blog post&amp;gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mhardi01</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-15T18:18:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lab validation of Latency benefits of Memory-Driven Flash for SQL Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/lab-validation-of-latency-benefits-of-memory-driven-flash-for/m-p/7042480#M13382</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://innovate2value.wordpress.com/2019/04/10/cut-sql-server-latency-in-half-with-memory-driven-flash-storage/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;New information&lt;/A&gt; is available on how all-flash storage with storage class memory cache (aka 'Memory-Driven Flash') can cut system latency in half.&amp;nbsp; Recent testing details 59% latency reduction for MS SQL Server 2017 workload on 3PAR 9k with Intel Optane SSD:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://innovate2value.wordpress.com/2019/04/10/cut-sql-server-latency-in-half-with-memory-driven-flash-storage/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&amp;lt;link to blog post&amp;gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/lab-validation-of-latency-benefits-of-memory-driven-flash-for/m-p/7042480#M13382</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhardi01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-15T18:18:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lab validation of Latency benefits of Memory-Driven Flash for SQL Server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/lab-validation-of-latency-benefits-of-memory-driven-flash-for/m-p/7043617#M13389</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I am wondering what is expected here. Are you expecting any response to any query of it was for information purpose only.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/lab-validation-of-latency-benefits-of-memory-driven-flash-for/m-p/7043617#M13389</guid>
      <dc:creator>Taurus78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-24T07:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

