<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: remote control solution - pcAnywhere or other? in Operating System - Microsoft</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/remote-control-solution-pcanywhere-or-other/m-p/2667460#M1746</link>
    <description>Can't help you on the security aspects though our pcAnywhere has several encryption options.  Do know that it's the only one we could find which operates reliably over a double satellite hop.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ron</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ron Kinner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-02-19T20:08:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>remote control solution - pcAnywhere or other?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/remote-control-solution-pcanywhere-or-other/m-p/2667459#M1745</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm looking for some constructive opinions on any remote control solution that will allow me to take control of a console of any NT4/Win2000 server in our IT environment around the globe.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The solution must be considered secure in order for it to be approved by our internal Security team.  This means suitable levels of authentication and control over who has access.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have been scared off by rumours that PCAnywhere is "easily broken" and are looking for verification that it or a similar package is secure enough. Does anyone have any strong opinions/experience on any solution that I should be aware of when reviewing PCAnywhere and its rivals?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Andy&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:53:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/remote-control-solution-pcanywhere-or-other/m-p/2667459#M1745</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andy Dane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-19T15:53:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: remote control solution - pcAnywhere or other?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/remote-control-solution-pcanywhere-or-other/m-p/2667460#M1746</link>
      <description>Can't help you on the security aspects though our pcAnywhere has several encryption options.  Do know that it's the only one we could find which operates reliably over a double satellite hop.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ron</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2002 20:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/remote-control-solution-pcanywhere-or-other/m-p/2667460#M1746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ron Kinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-19T20:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: remote control solution - pcAnywhere or other?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/remote-control-solution-pcanywhere-or-other/m-p/2667461#M1747</link>
      <description>We discarded PCAnywhere in favor of this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.binaryresearch.net/remotelyanywhere.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.binaryresearch.net/remotelyanywhere.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's as secure as anything else we looked at and works well over our WAN links.  The pricing is good, support is good and the developers are responsive to user feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;Paul</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:52:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/remote-control-solution-pcanywhere-or-other/m-p/2667461#M1747</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul R. Dittrich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-20T14:52:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

