<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAT16 vs. FAT32 in Operating System - Microsoft</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751227#M9933</link>
    <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Which file system is faster FAT16 or FAT32, after installing and booting&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; from USB stick?&lt;BR /&gt;FAT32 uses space effectively resulting in efficient use of the disk space.&lt;BR /&gt;It also overcomes the 2GB limit with FAT16. There may not be much of a&lt;BR /&gt;significant performance benefit of FAT32 when compared to FAT16.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; What are advantages and disadvantages? &lt;BR /&gt;Check the following link -&lt;BR /&gt;* FAT16 vs. FAT32 &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc940351.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc940351.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Murali</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>P Muralidhar Kini</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-11T15:00:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAT16 vs. FAT32</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751225#M9931</link>
      <description>hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd like to install live USB system.&lt;BR /&gt;Which file system is faster FAT16 or FAT32, after installing and booting from USB stick?&lt;BR /&gt;What are advantages and disadvantages?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:13:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751225#M9931</guid>
      <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-10T16:13:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAT16 vs. FAT32</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751226#M9932</link>
      <description>try &lt;A href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=&amp;amp;q=usb+fat16+vs+fat32&amp;amp;sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;amp;rlz=1B3GGLL_enUS366US366&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;aq=4&amp;amp;oq=usb+fat16+" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.google.com/search?hl=&amp;amp;q=usb+fat16+vs+fat32&amp;amp;sourceid=navclient-ff&amp;amp;rlz=1B3GGLL_enUS366US366&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;aq=4&amp;amp;oq=usb+fat16+&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751226#M9932</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sheldon Smith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-11T00:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAT16 vs. FAT32</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751227#M9933</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Which file system is faster FAT16 or FAT32, after installing and booting&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; from USB stick?&lt;BR /&gt;FAT32 uses space effectively resulting in efficient use of the disk space.&lt;BR /&gt;It also overcomes the 2GB limit with FAT16. There may not be much of a&lt;BR /&gt;significant performance benefit of FAT32 when compared to FAT16.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; What are advantages and disadvantages? &lt;BR /&gt;Check the following link -&lt;BR /&gt;* FAT16 vs. FAT32 &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc940351.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc940351.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Murali</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751227#M9933</guid>
      <dc:creator>P Muralidhar Kini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-11T15:00:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAT16 vs. FAT32</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751228#M9934</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How did the installation/boot from usb stick go about?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Murali</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:57:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751228#M9934</guid>
      <dc:creator>P Muralidhar Kini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-15T12:57:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAT16 vs. FAT32</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751229#M9935</link>
      <description>It was installed on linux debian using live-helper: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;LH_BINARY_FILESYSTEM="fat16"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;LH_BINARY_FILESYSTEM="fat32"</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:29:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751229#M9935</guid>
      <dc:creator>'chris'</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-15T15:29:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAT16 vs. FAT32</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751230#M9936</link>
      <description>Hi Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It does not matter that as much basically. The size of the File Allocation table entry . &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eg Fat 16 used in small disks basically ( &amp;lt; 512 MB), the size = 16 , so it the total number of files or entries possible = 2^16 = 65,536 entries . So  max file size possible := cluster_size * 65,536 .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But in Fat32 it theoretically becomes &lt;BR /&gt;max file size possible := cluster_size * 2 ^32. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But implementation wise fat16 and fat32 are more or else the same. There should not be much difference in performance other than the max file size it can address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can read the FAT specification to gain more knowledge.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;NOTE&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/fatgen103.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/fatgen103.pdf&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Truly Evil&lt;BR /&gt;Lucifer Megacruel&lt;/NOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-microsoft/fat16-vs-fat32/m-p/4751230#M9936</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lucifer Megacruel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-21T12:27:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

