<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: P 4000 VMkernel ports in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645856#M1101</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well the million dollar question is why shouldn't people use a multipath setup in P4000 infrastructure. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess figure 3 be applied only when you u use a other storage path policy then round roubin. But we want best practise and best peformance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess the document is alright but i think the author didn't seperated it in a logical way :)</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ivanbre</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-10T13:37:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P 4000 VMkernel ports</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645854#M1099</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I red the &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/menuitem.863c3e4cbcdc3f3515b49c108973a801?ciid=e87f9708310e4210VgnVCM100000a360ea10RCRD" target="_blank"&gt;http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/menuitem.863c3e4cbcdc3f3515b49c108973a801?ciid=e87f9708310e4210VgnVCM100000a360ea10RCRD&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now it's get confusing:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Figure 3 page 5. The figure is only showing 1 VMKernel port with 2 NICs bound&lt;BR /&gt;2. Page 6. It states from "Multi-pathing iSCSI for vSphere 4" ative iSCSI multi-pathing in vSphere 4 provides superior bandwidth performance by aggregating &lt;BR /&gt;network ports. Configuring iSCSI multi-pathing requires at least two network ports on the virtual &lt;BR /&gt;switch. The following steps must be performed on each ESX or ESXi server individually. &lt;BR /&gt;  Create a second VMkernel port on the virtual switch for iSCSI. &lt;BR /&gt;  For each VMkernel port on the virtual switch assign a different physical network adapter as the &lt;BR /&gt;active adapter. This ensures the multiple VMkernel ports use different network adapters for their I/O.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now it's get confusing. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For round robin MPIO to work correct i know a 1:1 mapping is the right approach. So that means we need to make VMKernel ports binded to 2 physical nics and a active/unused configuration as show in figure 5. I do see in figure 5 two vmkernel ports.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now my question : Is figure 3 something wrong in the documentation as that isn't best practise?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:04:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645854#M1099</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivanbre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-10T13:04:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P 4000 VMkernel ports</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645855#M1100</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;figure 3 appears to be a perfectly functioning configuration that would let the NETWORK stack perform the failover.  However what they are showing is NOT a multi pathing storage configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IMHO I agree with you, that if you have 6 ports (and don't need to dedicate any for a DMZ or anything) I would opt for a true vSphere 4/LeftHand multipathing setup with 2 separate iSCSI kernels each on their own vSwitch and configure Round Robin pathing through the storage stack.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645855#M1100</guid>
      <dc:creator>teledata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-10T13:31:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P 4000 VMkernel ports</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645856#M1101</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well the million dollar question is why shouldn't people use a multipath setup in P4000 infrastructure. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess figure 3 be applied only when you u use a other storage path policy then round roubin. But we want best practise and best peformance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess the document is alright but i think the author didn't seperated it in a logical way :)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:37:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645856#M1101</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivanbre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-10T13:37:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P 4000 VMkernel ports</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645857#M1102</link>
      <description>Yes.. a bit unclear.  I'm curious as well, why would a true round robin NOT be considered the recommended and best practice configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Storage multi pathing also appears to failover MUCH faster than network stack, so you reduce your chances of an iSCSI timeout (due to a NIC/cable/port failure) using storage multi pathing...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess that's why we have the forums.. We all know better than to rely only on "official" documentation... ;)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645857#M1102</guid>
      <dc:creator>teledata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-10T13:56:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P 4000 VMkernel ports</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645858#M1103</link>
      <description>Figure 3 does not make sense in an ESX4 world. As described later, in ESX4 you have a 1:1 relationship between the SW iSCSI initiator port on a VMkernel port and a pNIC. You cannot bind the SW iSCSI initiator to a port group with multiple active pNICs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The correct configuration in Figure 3 would be to add a second VMkernel port group. Maybe somebody did modify an ESX3 version of the document but forgot to replace the screenshot.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On page 6:&lt;BR /&gt;"Configuring iSCSI multi-pathing requires at least two network ports on the virtual switch."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well, you can also do multi-pathing with one initiator port and if you target offer the disk on multiple ports. Did work on ESX 3.5 already.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;  I'm curious as well, why would a true round robin NOT be&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; considered the recommended and best practice configuration.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They seem to do (for non multi-site configurations) - on page 7:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;esxcli nmp satp setdefaultpsp --satp VMW_SATP_DEFAULT_AA --psp VMW_PSP_RR</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:11:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645858#M1103</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-10T15:11:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P 4000 VMkernel ports</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645859#M1104</link>
      <description>I believe that figure 3 is incorrect. The vSwitch should have 2 network adapters but the VMkernel ports should only have one each assigned. In addition, I've been running the following script to enable multipathing in ESXi 4.0 and higher:&lt;BR /&gt;set VI_USERNAME=root&lt;BR /&gt;set VI_PASSWORD=LHN&lt;BR /&gt;set VI_SERVER=esx01&lt;BR /&gt;esxcli swiscsi nic add -n vmk1 -d=vmhba33&lt;BR /&gt;esxcli swiscsi nic add -n vmk2 -d=vmhba33&lt;BR /&gt;esxcli corestorage claiming unclaim --type location&lt;BR /&gt;esxcli nmp satp setdefaultpsp --satp VMW_SATP_DEFAULT_AA --psp VMW_PSP_RR&lt;BR /&gt;esxcli corestorage claimrule load&lt;BR /&gt;esxcli corestorage claimrule run&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(The esxcli corestorage claiming unclaim... command always returns an error). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is running in 3 separate production environments. Hope that I've got it right!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:35:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p-4000-vmkernel-ports/m-p/4645859#M1104</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Finch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-11T00:35:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

