<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MDL Perfomance in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/mdl-perfomance/m-p/4673778#M1382</link>
    <description>If you did the math, 16 MDL 7200RPM drives compared to the current config of 5 internal 10K SAS drives, do I loose performance if I go with the MDL. I think not but may not be a reliable as the SAS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the response!</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>5js</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-27T19:00:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MDL Perfomance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/mdl-perfomance/m-p/4673776#M1380</link>
      <description>For the G2 P4300 MDL starter san (16TB), can I expect better performance than the G1 SATA starter san. If so, by how much? I have 5 application servers with the following specs. This is a total read/write. The mail server has about 500 read iops out of the total. The largest app server has about 160 read iops out of the total. I would like to know if the MDL 16TB starter san is going to be okay.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;App Server,   200&lt;BR /&gt;App Server,    11&lt;BR /&gt;App Server,    75&lt;BR /&gt;Email Server, 540&lt;BR /&gt;App Server,    20</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/mdl-perfomance/m-p/4673776#M1380</guid>
      <dc:creator>5js</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-12T00:22:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MDL Perfomance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/mdl-perfomance/m-p/4673777#M1381</link>
      <description>Well the drives are not spinning any faster - so relatively - no the performance off the drive is not changing.  Sure you get benefits of the G3 platform - as far as CPU speeds, SAS interface, greener platform, etc.  You'll probably see an increas from about 800 IOPS to about 900 IOPS.  Sounds like it will need the immediate need - but you might want to consider either more nodes, or the 15K SAS drives.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You should engage you local HP sales team, and/or Partner to help you size this right.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/mdl-perfomance/m-p/4673777#M1381</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Lennie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-27T15:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MDL Perfomance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/mdl-perfomance/m-p/4673778#M1382</link>
      <description>If you did the math, 16 MDL 7200RPM drives compared to the current config of 5 internal 10K SAS drives, do I loose performance if I go with the MDL. I think not but may not be a reliable as the SAS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the response!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:00:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/mdl-perfomance/m-p/4673778#M1382</guid>
      <dc:creator>5js</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-27T19:00:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

