<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Active/Active Site Failover - Anyone doing it? in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/active-active-site-failover-anyone-doing-it/m-p/4691916#M1572</link>
    <description>&lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n3VpfesM8A" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n3VpfesM8A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've been looking at SAN/storage options and have been thinking very much in terms of "Live" and "Backup" sites. Both our locations are around 3/4 of a mile apart linked by 1 or 10gig ethernet (the fibre will take 10gig so it comes down to cost and necessity).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm now thinking why on earth wouldn't I want to go active/active if we're looking at Lefthand? I'm hoping to have them in next week to discuss options.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm a little blown away by that video tbh as it's not using expensive license options.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Appreciate any thoughts on whether vSphere's FT really is good enough that you'd be content with (for example):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Primary Site:&lt;BR /&gt;ESX Host&lt;BR /&gt;P4000&lt;BR /&gt;Single Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Secondary Site:&lt;BR /&gt;ESX Host&lt;BR /&gt;P4000&lt;BR /&gt;Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Paul Hutchings</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-27T15:55:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active/Active Site Failover - Anyone doing it?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/active-active-site-failover-anyone-doing-it/m-p/4691916#M1572</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n3VpfesM8A" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n3VpfesM8A&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've been looking at SAN/storage options and have been thinking very much in terms of "Live" and "Backup" sites. Both our locations are around 3/4 of a mile apart linked by 1 or 10gig ethernet (the fibre will take 10gig so it comes down to cost and necessity).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm now thinking why on earth wouldn't I want to go active/active if we're looking at Lefthand? I'm hoping to have them in next week to discuss options.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm a little blown away by that video tbh as it's not using expensive license options.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Appreciate any thoughts on whether vSphere's FT really is good enough that you'd be content with (for example):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Primary Site:&lt;BR /&gt;ESX Host&lt;BR /&gt;P4000&lt;BR /&gt;Single Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Secondary Site:&lt;BR /&gt;ESX Host&lt;BR /&gt;P4000&lt;BR /&gt;Switch (presumably with VLAN's to keep iSCSI and vMotion/FT traffic separated?)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/active-active-site-failover-anyone-doing-it/m-p/4691916#M1572</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Hutchings</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-27T15:55:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

