<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Long distance multisite config performance in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756852#M2418</link>
    <description>Yes your statement is correct (we are planning to use 10Gbe between sites) but consider this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;as an example, and this is how I think it works : Imagine 2 nodes configured with network raid 10 with a network latency of 0,5 mS one-way, so 1 mS round-trip.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Server writes to node 1, who commits the write to cache and copies the write to node 2. when the write is committed to cache in node 2 it in turn replies an ok back to node 1, who then replies an I/O complete to the server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I assume this dataflow is the case as it is standard practice in other arrays like an EVA.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, this latency limits the maximum I/Os in this example to 1000 per second because of the 1mS round-trip latency.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thats the reason I assume distance (latency) limits the performance of a multisite config, and I am looking for more specific information.&lt;BR /&gt;For instance I am not sure if this latency limits the overall performance of the cluster, or the performance of a node-pair.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is there a sizer or other info ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bart</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bart verberne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-24T15:33:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Long distance multisite config performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756850#M2416</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When designing a multisite config, I cannot find any info of the influence on total performance of a configuration when inter-site latency is substantial.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IE what is the performance of a 6-node multisite san (3 times P4500 SAS per site) when the distance is 50KM.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;tnx&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bart&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:34:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756850#M2416</guid>
      <dc:creator>bart verberne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-23T12:34:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Long distance multisite config performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756851#M2417</link>
      <description>2 Points about Multi-Site SAN here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) Multi-site SAN configuration should not have any significant impact on performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) A multi-site SAN REQUIRES a GbE connection with &amp;lt; 2-3ms average latency</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:12:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756851#M2417</guid>
      <dc:creator>teledata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-23T22:12:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Long distance multisite config performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756852#M2418</link>
      <description>Yes your statement is correct (we are planning to use 10Gbe between sites) but consider this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;as an example, and this is how I think it works : Imagine 2 nodes configured with network raid 10 with a network latency of 0,5 mS one-way, so 1 mS round-trip.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Server writes to node 1, who commits the write to cache and copies the write to node 2. when the write is committed to cache in node 2 it in turn replies an ok back to node 1, who then replies an I/O complete to the server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I assume this dataflow is the case as it is standard practice in other arrays like an EVA.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, this latency limits the maximum I/Os in this example to 1000 per second because of the 1mS round-trip latency.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thats the reason I assume distance (latency) limits the performance of a multisite config, and I am looking for more specific information.&lt;BR /&gt;For instance I am not sure if this latency limits the overall performance of the cluster, or the performance of a node-pair.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is there a sizer or other info ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bart</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756852#M2418</guid>
      <dc:creator>bart verberne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-24T15:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Long distance multisite config performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756853#M2419</link>
      <description>I was just pondering this, and as I understand it, unless you are suffering a local node failure you should be accessing the local VIP and local storage nodes only, but I understand the concern about increased latency while the I/O is being replicated to the (N+1) nodes at the remote location.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I guess the real question is, DOES an I/O transaction wait for confirmation of the Network RAID copy before an ack is sent back to the client?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Technically speaking your entire IO transaction can be completed on the local site, and only a mirror copy of your datablocks is sent over the WAN (Assuming all links and nodes are up and healthy).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'll ask around as well, but if you find out anything be sure to post it back here!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756853#M2419</guid>
      <dc:creator>teledata</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-01T14:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Long distance multisite config performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756854#M2420</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any updates regarding this topic?&lt;BR /&gt;I would also like to know the answer.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Eric</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 04:17:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/long-distance-multisite-config-performance/m-p/4756854#M2420</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericvandermeer_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-13T04:17:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

