<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VSA CPU And Memory Configuration in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778514#M2602</link>
    <description>Requirements&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ Hyper-V host server running a supported 64â  bit Windows OS&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ A single virtual CPU with at least 2000 MHz reserved&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ At least 1 GB (1024 MB) of memory reserved&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ Approximately 13 GB available drive space&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Network RAID 5 requires Parity Calculation by the VSA, hence the high CPU usage.&lt;BR /&gt;The Memory requirement also increases drastically due to the Parity Calculation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My recommendation is to use Network RAID 10.&lt;BR /&gt;If one of the VSA goes down, it pulls down the SAN performance quite a Lot for Network RAID 5 volumes.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:06:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jitun</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-18T16:06:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VSA CPU And Memory Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778513#M2601</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I have a P4000 (3x DL380 G6) Lefthand Cluster with 3 VSA.&lt;BR /&gt;I have modified the Network RAID settings from Network RAID 10 (2Way) to Network RAID 5. My Custumer told me, that after the RAID 5 configuration the CPU load on all 3 VSAÂ´s goes  straight ahead to 100%. See Screenshot of one VSA.&lt;BR /&gt;My question is, did I become better performance, when I add a second vCPU to the VSAÂ´s and increase the memory. 3 Volumes with the total size of 4,5 TB is provisioned. Default settings for a VSA (*.ovf vmware) are 1CPU with 2000 MHz reserved and 384 MB memory.&lt;BR /&gt;Information about the Network.&lt;BR /&gt;2x 1810 Procurve Switches. Jumboframes enabled. Port Policy Any-to-Any&lt;BR /&gt;Jumboframes are also enabled on the vSwitch Kernel Port (Vmware).</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778513#M2601</guid>
      <dc:creator>hillibilli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-18T07:06:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSA CPU And Memory Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778514#M2602</link>
      <description>Requirements&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ Hyper-V host server running a supported 64â  bit Windows OS&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ A single virtual CPU with at least 2000 MHz reserved&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ At least 1 GB (1024 MB) of memory reserved&lt;BR /&gt;â ¢ Approximately 13 GB available drive space&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Network RAID 5 requires Parity Calculation by the VSA, hence the high CPU usage.&lt;BR /&gt;The Memory requirement also increases drastically due to the Parity Calculation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My recommendation is to use Network RAID 10.&lt;BR /&gt;If one of the VSA goes down, it pulls down the SAN performance quite a Lot for Network RAID 5 volumes.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:06:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778514#M2602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jitun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-18T16:06:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSA CPU And Memory Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778515#M2603</link>
      <description>Do not use more than one vCPU.&lt;BR /&gt;I've seen VSAs hang during boot when multiple vCPUs were used.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:28:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778515#M2603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-18T18:28:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSA CPU And Memory Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778516#M2604</link>
      <description>Thank you very much. I think I must prepare my Customer for NWR10(2Way) and they have to accept the fewer GB capacity.&lt;BR /&gt;For my understand, NWR5 is for Backup and Remote Copy. RAID10 is for Production.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have one additional question. During the Ugrade from SAN/IQ 8.5 to 9.0 the upgrade progress hungs. I have canceled  the upgrade progress. When I start the upgrade again I become an error Message, see sreenshot. After I have rebooted the affected VSA and started the upgrade again, I become the same error message. I have generated a HP CASE 2 Weeks ago and nothing happens. Do I need to reinstall the VSA? What would you do? &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:54:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778516#M2604</guid>
      <dc:creator>hillibilli</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-20T07:54:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSA CPU And Memory Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778517#M2605</link>
      <description>Hi Hille, I am not sure if I can ask you for a Case number here on the forum.&lt;BR /&gt;Email it to me.&lt;BR /&gt;I can have a check.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/vsa-cpu-and-memory-configuration/m-p/4778517#M2605</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jitun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-20T16:54:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

