<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Network RAID-5 and 6 question in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234001#M3243</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the new SAN/IQ release (8.5) it's possible to set a volume to network RAID-5 and 6. It will write the blocks to different Storage Nodes and also a parity block is written to a node(in case of RAID-6 two parities are written). When creating a volume with the new RAID levels, a messages is displayed telling that with this RAID levels thin provisioning will be the best choice (and it defaults to that setting). Also a snapshot schedule is automaticly created to snapshot the volume once a day and keep one snapshot alive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone knows why this is done?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thnx ahead, Richard.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:04:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Richard v. Laanen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-08T09:04:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Network RAID-5 and 6 question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234001#M3243</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the new SAN/IQ release (8.5) it's possible to set a volume to network RAID-5 and 6. It will write the blocks to different Storage Nodes and also a parity block is written to a node(in case of RAID-6 two parities are written). When creating a volume with the new RAID levels, a messages is displayed telling that with this RAID levels thin provisioning will be the best choice (and it defaults to that setting). Also a snapshot schedule is automaticly created to snapshot the volume once a day and keep one snapshot alive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone knows why this is done?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thnx ahead, Richard.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:04:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234001#M3243</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard v. Laanen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-08T09:04:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Network RAID-5 and 6 question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234002#M3244</link>
      <description>The snapshot is in a different RAID level -- if I remember correctly, this is for performance reasons - otherwise we'd see the 'RAID-5/6 write penalty'.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:23:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234002#M3244</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-08T09:23:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Network RAID-5 and 6 question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234003#M3245</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="http://blogs.hp.com/p4000/2010/02/12/network-raid-5-and-6-explained/" target="_blank"&gt;http://blogs.hp.com/p4000/2010/02/12/network-raid-5-and-6-explained/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Highlights:&lt;BR /&gt;Network RAID5 is a Background Parity Based Encoding method that reclaims disk space based on snapshots that are taken.  I'll refer to it as PBNR (parity based network raid)&lt;BR /&gt;The top level volume is still a Network RAID10 volume, and that is to maintain performance and availability.&lt;BR /&gt;PBNR does not run on the top level volume because of the performance impact of the read-modify-write algorithms for small writes&lt;BR /&gt;Over time snapshots are merged over time, and most of the data end up in there&lt;BR /&gt;The greater the change rate, the less space is 'reclaimed'&lt;BR /&gt;Make sure the default schedule that is setup for the snapshots is setup to off peak hours&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:12:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234003#M3245</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert Lennie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-14T19:12:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Network RAID-5 and 6 question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234004#M3246</link>
      <description>Robert,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your answer is very usefull, thanx.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Richard.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234004#M3246</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard v. Laanen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T05:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Network RAID-5 and 6 question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234005#M3247</link>
      <description>The answer of Robert is right on the money.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/network-raid-5-and-6-question/m-p/5234005#M3247</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard v. Laanen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T05:26:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

