<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multiple sites with two-node clusters + FOM in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246319#M3302</link>
    <description>Why don't you run a FOM in the ESXs you already have? If you install on a local disk (not a iSCSI LUN) you'll have a functional VM even if there's a storage outage. Run 2 FOMs (one in each ESX) for extra security :-) .</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:10:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fran Garcia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-07T21:10:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple sites with two-node clusters + FOM</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246317#M3300</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can someone share their thoughts on the scenario described below?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;- multiple remote sites, each one of them independent&lt;BR /&gt;- goal: deliver as much local resiliency as possible (site-to-site fail-over is out of scope / not required)&lt;BR /&gt;- two physical servers (with internal storage only) with vSphere 4 Advanced at each site&lt;BR /&gt;- two VSAs at each site&lt;BR /&gt;- two Windows VMs at each site - to be protected by vSphere Fault Tolerance&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My understanding of P4000 fail-over process is that Failover Manager is a must for the above to work (correct me if that's not the case)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And this is what I think regarding FOM hosting:&lt;BR /&gt;1) A third physical box running FOM at each site (desktop with VMware Player? Server with ESXi?)&lt;BR /&gt;OR&lt;BR /&gt;2) Multiple instances of FOM installed on one ESX server at the central site. Each FOM instance will access their relevant VSA clusters &amp;amp; maintain quorums remotely over WAN links.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Comments please?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 10:08:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246317#M3300</guid>
      <dc:creator>raadek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-05T10:08:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple sites with two-node clusters + FOM</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246318#M3301</link>
      <description>You would need a FOM at each site to maintain quorum in case of a failure. For FOM hosting,option 1 would work. Option 2 ill create a single point of failure and latency.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 03:17:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246318#M3301</guid>
      <dc:creator>ajamil786</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-07T03:17:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple sites with two-node clusters + FOM</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246319#M3302</link>
      <description>Why don't you run a FOM in the ESXs you already have? If you install on a local disk (not a iSCSI LUN) you'll have a functional VM even if there's a storage outage. Run 2 FOMs (one in each ESX) for extra security :-) .</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:10:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246319#M3302</guid>
      <dc:creator>Fran Garcia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-07T21:10:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple sites with two-node clusters + FOM</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246320#M3303</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;You may wish to know that you can only have 1 FOM or a VM per management group.&lt;BR /&gt;Mark...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246320#M3303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark...</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-08T07:21:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple sites with two-node clusters + FOM</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246321#M3304</link>
      <description>Guys,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks for your replies.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Long story short, HP/LHN confirmed that a third physical box running FOM at each site is required to maintain resiliency.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246321#M3304</guid>
      <dc:creator>raadek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-22T14:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple sites with two-node clusters + FOM</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246322#M3305</link>
      <description>Thread closed</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/multiple-sites-with-two-node-clusters-fom/m-p/5246322#M3305</guid>
      <dc:creator>raadek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-22T14:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

