<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: P4500G2 Hardware RAID Level in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p4500g2-hardware-raid-level/m-p/5655043#M5182</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;stay away from a 12-dirsk raid5 group.&amp;nbsp; the rebuild time will be so long that there is a high likelyhood of an unrecoveralbe data loss before the rebuild is complete.&amp;nbsp; The benefit of getting that 1/12th extra space is never worth the risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have the time to find the link, but google did a large study on sibling mortality rates and found that drives produced together in the factory tended to fail together in the field when subjected to similar loads.&amp;nbsp; Short story is that when one disk fails, there is an even higher chance that another disk will fail if all the disks were purchased togther.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use raid6 if you really want one large span, but ask yourself why...&amp;nbsp; HP decided on the two raid5 over one large array for a reason.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>oikjn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-11T16:47:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P4500G2 Hardware RAID Level</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p4500g2-hardware-raid-level/m-p/5653345#M5176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are just installing our first P4500 and I got a little Question about the Hardware RAID Level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The P4500 comes with 2 x RAID 5 per node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if it would be better (performance wise) to make 1 large RAID 5 spanning all 12 disks?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any downsides doing this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andreas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:17:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p4500g2-hardware-raid-level/m-p/5653345#M5176</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Neuner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-10T09:17:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P4500G2 Hardware RAID Level</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p4500g2-hardware-raid-level/m-p/5653475#M5177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, there's some math and statistics behind why having a RAID5 on a 12 disk array.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/"&gt;http://www.miracleas.com/BAARF/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;has some subjective posts that explain some of the statistics involved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may want to investigate if RAID6 is a possibility. If so, does that make a performance difference?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does a larger RAID6 array have a longer rebuild time than 2 RAID5?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p4500g2-hardware-raid-level/m-p/5653475#M5177</guid>
      <dc:creator>Johan Guldmyr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-10T11:08:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P4500G2 Hardware RAID Level</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p4500g2-hardware-raid-level/m-p/5655043#M5182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;stay away from a 12-dirsk raid5 group.&amp;nbsp; the rebuild time will be so long that there is a high likelyhood of an unrecoveralbe data loss before the rebuild is complete.&amp;nbsp; The benefit of getting that 1/12th extra space is never worth the risk.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have the time to find the link, but google did a large study on sibling mortality rates and found that drives produced together in the factory tended to fail together in the field when subjected to similar loads.&amp;nbsp; Short story is that when one disk fails, there is an even higher chance that another disk will fail if all the disks were purchased togther.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Use raid6 if you really want one large span, but ask yourself why...&amp;nbsp; HP decided on the two raid5 over one large array for a reason.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:47:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/p4500g2-hardware-raid-level/m-p/5655043#M5182</guid>
      <dc:creator>oikjn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-11T16:47:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

