<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Failover Manager Bandwidth Requirements in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/failover-manager-bandwidth-requirements/m-p/5940349#M6233</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do many vSphere 5 metro stroage cluster implementations and have always had to put the FOM in one of the two physical sites, often stated by HP as a "3rd logical site".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand all the requirements such as maximum RTT, minimum ISL bandwidth between sites, etc but I cannot understand the requirement of the FOM needing at least 100 Mbps connectivity between itself and the storage nodes in a vMSC configuration as per the vSphere 5 Metro Storage Cluster document &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA4-0955ENW.pdf"&gt;http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA4-0955ENW.pdf&lt;/A&gt; (page 6)&amp;nbsp; If the FOM does no data movement, then why the need for 100Mbps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here in Australia not many people are able to afford a 100Mb tail which means we cannot have the FOM in a 3rd physical site which would be optimal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's everyones' experience with FOM placement with regard to network bandwidth?&amp;nbsp; Has anyone put it in a 3rd site with sub-100Mb bandwidth?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KFM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:08:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KFM_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-23T07:08:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover Manager Bandwidth Requirements</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/failover-manager-bandwidth-requirements/m-p/5940349#M6233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do many vSphere 5 metro stroage cluster implementations and have always had to put the FOM in one of the two physical sites, often stated by HP as a "3rd logical site".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand all the requirements such as maximum RTT, minimum ISL bandwidth between sites, etc but I cannot understand the requirement of the FOM needing at least 100 Mbps connectivity between itself and the storage nodes in a vMSC configuration as per the vSphere 5 Metro Storage Cluster document &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA4-0955ENW.pdf"&gt;http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA4-0955ENW.pdf&lt;/A&gt; (page 6)&amp;nbsp; If the FOM does no data movement, then why the need for 100Mbps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here in Australia not many people are able to afford a 100Mb tail which means we cannot have the FOM in a 3rd physical site which would be optimal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's everyones' experience with FOM placement with regard to network bandwidth?&amp;nbsp; Has anyone put it in a 3rd site with sub-100Mb bandwidth?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;KFM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 07:08:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/failover-manager-bandwidth-requirements/m-p/5940349#M6233</guid>
      <dc:creator>KFM_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-23T07:08:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

