<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Node Network Utilization in StoreVirtual Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635568#M992</link>
    <description>Is Node 1 the VIP?  If so, that may be the reason for the increased traffic.  There is additional traffic overhead for the VIP.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are you using MPIO?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:44:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bryan McMullan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-05-24T14:44:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Node Network Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635567#M991</link>
      <description>I have a 2 node cluster with both gb NICs on each node spread across 2 stacked extreme x450e switches.  I have been monitoring my throughput utilization of the two NICs on each node and noticed that node 1 will appear to have near equal utilization on both NIC ports, while node 2 appears to have one nic port with similar utilization as node 1, but the second nic port will have next to 0 utilization.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has anyone seen this before?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm using ALB load balancing on both nodes.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 03:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635567#M991</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve McGee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-19T03:00:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Node Network Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635568#M992</link>
      <description>Is Node 1 the VIP?  If so, that may be the reason for the increased traffic.  There is additional traffic overhead for the VIP.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are you using MPIO?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:44:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635568#M992</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bryan McMullan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-24T14:44:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Node Network Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635569#M993</link>
      <description>I am using MPIO, but with VIP that doesn't matter does it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If during heavy SAN disk access I'm seeing 30% on three of the four NICs it leads me to think that things aren't operating properly.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I can't say that I'm experiencing any issues, but I've not been a lefthand user but for a few months, so I'm not qualified to make that assumption yet :).</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 18:09:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635569#M993</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve McGee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-24T18:09:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Node Network Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635570#M994</link>
      <description>ALB does not equate to fully balanced on each NIC. There are times when we have no traffic on one NIC and a bit on the other.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try to fail the active NIC on node 2.  If everything continues to work as expected, it is just the load balancing algorithm.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635570#M994</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bryan McMullan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-24T19:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Node Network Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635571#M995</link>
      <description>I actually have already performed that procedure and everything appeared to function properly.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the clarification.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:22:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storevirtual-storage/node-network-utilization/m-p/4635571#M995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve McGee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-24T19:22:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

