<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Processor Utilization in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453861#M11853</link>
    <description>N4000-Dual Processor.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are facing processor 1  utlization is much heavy than Processor 0 always.&lt;BR /&gt;I have looked the statistics for one month and found that processor 1 is utilized&lt;BR /&gt;nearly 60% and processor 0 is utilized only 30%. How can I load balance the&lt;BR /&gt;processor? Is there any way? Pls help.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2000 06:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Madanagopalan S</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-10-16T06:38:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Processor Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453861#M11853</link>
      <description>N4000-Dual Processor.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are facing processor 1  utlization is much heavy than Processor 0 always.&lt;BR /&gt;I have looked the statistics for one month and found that processor 1 is utilized&lt;BR /&gt;nearly 60% and processor 0 is utilized only 30%. How can I load balance the&lt;BR /&gt;processor? Is there any way? Pls help.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2000 06:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453861#M11853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Madanagopalan S</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-10-16T06:38:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Processor Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453862#M11854</link>
      <description>see ITRC DOC ID KBRC00000947 : System Performance Tunning Guide may be helpful ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It may also be a programming threads issue i guess depending upon your setup,load,applications etc ......</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2000 06:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453862#M11854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Glennie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-10-16T06:58:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Processor Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453863#M11855</link>
      <description>I'm not sure I'd worry about averages over a month, as it's too longer a period. However, during peak load, that is when I would be concerned. If 1 cpu is at 100% and the other is at 50% then that's something to worry about.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The scheduler will alway try not to move a process from 1 cpu to another as it's wasteful. However, if the cpu it would like to run it on is very busy then obviously it will. If both cpu's have a tiny run queue, the scheduler will probably decide to keep it where it is.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Typically, at peak, cpu 0 will always be slightly higher than the rest and this is normal.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2000 07:21:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453863#M11855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andy Monks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-10-16T07:21:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Processor Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453864#M11856</link>
      <description>When you look at a long time utilization this number will be skewed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Every 1 second if there is a 20% deviation between the utilization of 1 processor and&lt;BR /&gt;another a single thread may be moved to balance utilization.  Many times based on&lt;BR /&gt;the runable threads there is not one that can be moved.  But the OS does try to &lt;BR /&gt;balance the CPU utilization.  It is expensive to move threads between processors&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From HP Education Customer Course: Inside HPUX</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453864#M11856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Emil Velez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-10-17T18:43:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Processor Utilization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453865#M11857</link>
      <description>To add to the words above: compare only at peak usage.  Alternatively, look at a history with sar or measurewear/Perfview and check relative values at specific time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;60%/30% is not really indicative of a problem.  Only when one processor approaches full load is balancing really a concern.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2000 19:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/processor-utilization/m-p/2453865#M11857</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Riggs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-10-17T19:12:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

