<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CPU Utilisation in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198449#M166127</link>
    <description>HP-UX doesn't allow a single process to consume all of the CPU time unless there is nothing else running. If two processes want 100% of the CPU, they will get 50% each over time. HP-UX will switch between the programs ever timeslice interval (typically 100ms), and even a dozen programs that use 100% of the CPU will not slow down interactive programs like vi or a shell prompt. HP-UX will process I/O interrupts without regard to the CPU load. You can force a program to take be scheduled less often by using nice.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bill Hassell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-02-21T17:04:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CPU Utilisation</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198446#M166124</link>
      <description>Hi Gurus,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any way by which I can prevent any process from consuming 100% CPU. In other words, I want to run that process, but by consuming lesser CPU %.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Siddhesh.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 04:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198446#M166124</guid>
      <dc:creator>Siddhesh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-21T04:21:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Utilisation</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198447#M166125</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Nice&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Man nice&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Paula</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198447#M166125</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paula J Frazer-Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-21T06:05:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Utilisation</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198448#M166126</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;try looking into PRM, e.g.:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/B8733-90001/B8733-90001.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/B8733-90001/B8733-90001.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;John K.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198448#M166126</guid>
      <dc:creator>john korterman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-21T07:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Utilisation</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198449#M166127</link>
      <description>HP-UX doesn't allow a single process to consume all of the CPU time unless there is nothing else running. If two processes want 100% of the CPU, they will get 50% each over time. HP-UX will switch between the programs ever timeslice interval (typically 100ms), and even a dozen programs that use 100% of the CPU will not slow down interactive programs like vi or a shell prompt. HP-UX will process I/O interrupts without regard to the CPU load. You can force a program to take be scheduled less often by using nice.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:04:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198449#M166127</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill Hassell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-21T17:04:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Utilisation</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198450#M166128</link>
      <description>you may use top then adjust the priority with nice</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:32:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198450#M166128</guid>
      <dc:creator>nibble</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-21T17:32:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU Utilisation</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198451#M166129</link>
      <description>added to the above...PRM.. (process resource management)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you have a few "types" of application on the computer you can split them into groups and assign resource limits.. (However I think these resource limits are generally whole CPU's etc).  But if one application is "hogging" lots of CPU, &amp;amp; interfering with another application on the same computer, then PRM may help...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...I suspect that the problem you facing is process like fc60mon, or cclogd ..etc.. regularly hitting 100%.  Generally these are fixed with patches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Lastly...  We run a database, Informix, and even after careful tuning we sometimes see "oninit" processes at 100%.  This is not necessarily a problem, provided you are getting 100% work out of it.  Infact some people recon you are getting your moneies worth out of it in this case (e.g. you buy an 8 cpu box but only run it at 40%, why not buy a 4 CPU box and run it at 80% &amp;amp; save money...)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;good luck&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Tim</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2004 06:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-utilisation/m-p/3198451#M166129</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim D Fulford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-02-22T06:15:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

