<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMP load balancing in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212012#M168698</link>
    <description>Hi Mikko,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's not enough to just have multiple CPUs - the application MUST be written multi-threaded to use *more* than one CPU.&lt;BR /&gt;I suspect in your case the app is single-threaded &amp;amp; if so, it will *always* live on one &amp;amp; only one CPU when it starts up.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds,&lt;BR /&gt;Jeff</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Schussele</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-03-08T11:38:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212009#M168695</link>
      <description>We have a 4-CPU rp5470 running our application. Attached is the top output of the situation, when one of our processes (in fact, it's from third party) freaked out (fooProcess). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My question is that how is the load balancing between prosessors working in HP-UX SMP? If you take a look at the attached output, seems like CPU 3 is doing much more work than other processors. Due to that, our own application may fail to timeouts on socket handling (Yes, I know that our own application should work better ;| ). Is there anyway to balance the situation? Or in the other hand, is there really any need to balance that situation?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212009#M168695</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timo J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-08T08:33:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212010#M168696</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think you go may for Process Resource &lt;BR /&gt;Manager(PRM) or Work Load Manager (WLM)&lt;BR /&gt;to allocate resources for processes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TT</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 09:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212010#M168696</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thayanidhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-08T09:39:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212011#M168697</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt; You have something called processor sets with Process Resource Manager. You can use this to restict the application usage to a specific processor.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; Workload manager works hand-in-hand with PRM and it is the only Goal based Work load management tool available in the market right now.&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;  PRM is metric based workload management tool.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212011#M168697</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sundar_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-08T11:32:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212012#M168698</link>
      <description>Hi Mikko,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's not enough to just have multiple CPUs - the application MUST be written multi-threaded to use *more* than one CPU.&lt;BR /&gt;I suspect in your case the app is single-threaded &amp;amp; if so, it will *always* live on one &amp;amp; only one CPU when it starts up.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds,&lt;BR /&gt;Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212012#M168698</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Schussele</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-08T11:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212013#M168699</link>
      <description>Jeff,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the application is multi-threaded. Looks like we had to purchase that PRM.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212013#M168699</guid>
      <dc:creator>Timo J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-09T00:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMP load balancing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212014#M168700</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;Is this the same situation always when u do top i.e. always does the foo process goes to only one cpu an choke it ?&lt;BR /&gt;If yes then your process is a single thread one but as far as SMP in HP is concerned it is always balanced between the resources.&lt;BR /&gt;You can also use glance plus for more information and benchmarks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 01:01:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/smp-load-balancing/m-p/3212014#M168700</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shaikh Imran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-03-09T01:01:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

