<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: About IP routing in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271135#M178680</link>
    <description>And ensure set ip_forwardig=1.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you have 3 computers with 2 cards each, you can form a triangle with routes either way round, so if one goes down the other two should be able to route for it...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All of the good stuff above I would NOT reccomend this as the databases will probably need maintainance and so this will put extra constraints on the mainainatnance of these machines.  But if you are $$$/â ¬â ¬â ¬â ¬ constrained then it will work and will be quite cheap</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 02:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tim D Fulford</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-05-09T02:34:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>About IP routing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271132#M178677</link>
      <description>The below is my company system structure , we have  three IP secments which are 168.1.172.x , 168.1.171.x and 168.1.170.x ,  about  50 client machine and one unix database server in each IP  secment, each user need to access all servers , we have a windows NT server that dedicate for IP routing  , as the NT server is not very stable , I want to let the unix server run the  IP routing (, is it possible ? which one is better if run IP routing at unix server or run at a dedicate NT server ?  thx</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2004 14:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271132#M178677</guid>
      <dc:creator>eddiechu_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-08T14:44:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About IP routing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271133#M178678</link>
      <description>Does your hp-ux systems have multiple&lt;BR /&gt;netwrok adapters?&lt;BR /&gt;If you have two network adaptors per server,&lt;BR /&gt;configure the second network adaptors in&lt;BR /&gt;different sub net and connect all together.&lt;BR /&gt;enable GATED=1 in /etc/rc.config.d/netconf&lt;BR /&gt;Define the proper route in all servers for&lt;BR /&gt;each other.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Approach this with more care. Back up netconf&lt;BR /&gt;before editing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TT</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 02:09:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271133#M178678</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thayanidhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-09T02:09:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About IP routing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271134#M178679</link>
      <description>Don't back up netconf in /etc/rc.config.d that will mess up your system badly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 02:20:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271134#M178679</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-09T02:20:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About IP routing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271135#M178680</link>
      <description>And ensure set ip_forwardig=1.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you have 3 computers with 2 cards each, you can form a triangle with routes either way round, so if one goes down the other two should be able to route for it...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All of the good stuff above I would NOT reccomend this as the databases will probably need maintainance and so this will put extra constraints on the mainainatnance of these machines.  But if you are $$$/â ¬â ¬â ¬â ¬ constrained then it will work and will be quite cheap</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 02:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271135#M178680</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim D Fulford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-09T02:34:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About IP routing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271136#M178681</link>
      <description>If your are looking for reliabilty and performance i would recommend to go for a separate layer III Switch or an dedicated Router for the entire Setup.&lt;BR /&gt;Don't know if you can approve budget for the same.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 02:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271136#M178681</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bharat Katkar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-09T02:59:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About IP routing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271137#M178682</link>
      <description>You have a few very good options here, but I think the best bet would be to tear down the NT box and rebuild it with Linux or FreeBSD. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Both have excellent routing subsystems, and are easy to configure. I would also suggest you look at consolidating your 3 subnets. Unless there is a compelling reason to have separate subnets (like a slow link between sites) everything usually works better in a single switched fabric. K.I.S.S is the word of the day. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As a high cost option, you should look into layer 3 switches. Cisco, bay networks, and foundry networks provide very high quality, low downtime, and layer 3 switches.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you can pull it, get a layer 3 switch and consolidate into 2 or even 1 subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2004 12:04:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/about-ip-routing/m-p/3271137#M178682</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Bianco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-05-09T12:04:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

