<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Disk performance analysis in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/disk-performance-analysis/m-p/3508164#M217795</link>
    <description>CACHE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;disk utilization is based upon cache hits, not amount of IO&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry d brown jr</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-03-20T06:57:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Disk performance analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/disk-performance-analysis/m-p/3508163#M217794</link>
      <description>I was comparing a measureware output for disk performance. The disk mentioned below is a 34GB Meta disk in an EMC array and is made of 4 * 8GB slices. If you see below the same disk has Disk util% as 88% when it has low values for reads, IO's, Bytes transferred only writes is high. Could some one explain how the disk util% is calculated. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Path    Phy rd  Phy wr Phy IO  Phy KB  Disk%&lt;BR /&gt;X.X.7.6  88025   328   88474   826286  88.56&lt;BR /&gt;X.X.7.6  128430  270   128790  1198080 55.17&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please find below another disk which is also a 34GB meta disk made of 4 * 8GB slices&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;X.X.8.1  92959 119 93168 979763 100&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but here the disk util% is 100 but the values are very less compared to the previous output of 55% utilization. How is this possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also find below another output just to show that high write does not change the utilization % too much.&lt;BR /&gt;X.X.8.1 38152 3348 41590 411872 40.29&lt;BR /&gt;X.X.8.1 27930 690 28710 278970 50.87&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone have some optimum values for the stats we get from mwa for disk, network, mem, cpu etc. I know this depends a lot on our config but for some general stuff like for the disk mentioned above or for example for a 1GB NIC etc..</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 04:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/disk-performance-analysis/m-p/3508163#M217794</guid>
      <dc:creator>hpuxsa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-20T04:38:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk performance analysis</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/disk-performance-analysis/m-p/3508164#M217795</link>
      <description>CACHE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;disk utilization is based upon cache hits, not amount of IO&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry d brown jr</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2005 06:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/disk-performance-analysis/m-p/3508164#M217795</guid>
      <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-20T06:57:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

