topic Re: Backup Restore in Operating System - HP-UX

Backup Restore

Himanshu_3 — Fri, 06 May 2005 14:52:35 GMT

Hi All,

Is it possible that restore of backup taken on HP -UX system thorugh tar are not successfull and on the same tape drive and same tape, if backup is taken through fbackup restore doesnt't have any problems. The error we get on the tar backup is as

# tar tvf /dev/rmt/26mn
Tar: blocksize = 16
Backup on the tape were successfull but while listing and restoring it had problems. The backup taken with tar had been given without any options, as default.We tried all options
for different blocksizes as below

tar tvfb 64 /dev/rmt/26mn
tar tvfb 20 /dev/rmt/26mn
tar tvfb 16 /dev/rmt/26mn

Why is it so that backups taken with fbackup are restored with success while listing and restoring from tar has problems.

Thanx
Himanshu

Re: Backup Restore

Patrick Wallek — Fri, 06 May 2005 14:57:02 GMT

Was the tar backup taken with the HP-UX version of tar or the Gnu Tar?

It sounds like either the tape was overwritten with something else, or the tape somehow got scrambled.

Re: Backup Restore

Steven E. Protter — Fri, 06 May 2005 17:35:02 GMT

If fbackup works and tar does not:

tar version may be bad. As noted above, the tape may have been hammered, or the heads could have been dirty when the tar was written.

A fair test is to take a fresh tape, make a tar to tape (the default) and then try and restore the file.

Then do the same thing with a fresh tape with fbackup.

If both tests work, you have no problem and the prior answer is correct, bad luck. If the tar test fails, make sure tar is patched and see what verion of tar you are actually using.

SEP

Re: Backup Restore

Bill Hassell — Fri, 06 May 2005 20:44:04 GMT

HP-UX tar cannot read tapes with any blocksize other than the default or by specifying the correct blocksize. Use pax instead to restore your data. pax can read any blocksize for tar or cpio and restore your data. The tar tapes may have been created over a network which means that someone messed with the blocksize.

Re: Backup Restore

Himanshu_3 — Mon, 09 May 2005 11:54:38 GMT

Hi Patrick,

The command used was
tar cvf /dev/rmt/0mn /DDL1/archive.

We have ultimately got the drives replaced and all seems to be well. Can a drive make such a defference that it is able to do fbackup and not tar ?

Cheers,
Himanshu

Re: Backup Restore

john korterman — Mon, 09 May 2005 12:16:30 GMT

Hi,
the success of fbackup may be caused by the fact that it was written to the RE-winding tape device.
You tar command uses the NON-rewinding device, /dev/rmt/0mn , causing data to be written to the tape, starting at the current tape position (whatever that might be).
Rewind your tape - before and writing a tar backup to a non-rewinding device, e.g.:
# mt -t /dev/rmt/0mn rew
in order to establish a valid starting point, or use the non-rewinding device.

regards,
John K.

Re: Backup Restore

Himanshu_3 — Mon, 09 May 2005 12:39:24 GMT

John,

Rewind of the tape had been performed before taking the tar backup.

Thanx
Himanshu