<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718318#M252276</link>
    <description>Pedro,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Monitor also the checkpoint frequency:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select value &lt;BR /&gt;from v$sysstat&lt;BR /&gt;where name like '%DBWR checkpoints%'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select &lt;VALUE_FROM_PREVIOUS_QUERY&gt; / (sysdate - startup_time) "Checkopints/Hour" from v$instance;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You should have from at least 1 to a maximum of 10 checkpoints per hour. Less or more than that is bad...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eric Antunes&lt;/VALUE_FROM_PREVIOUS_QUERY&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric Antunes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-27T07:17:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718307#M252265</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've a DataWarehouse running on rp4440 with 2 CPUs and 2 Gb RAM, connected to a Symmetrix DMX-800 with 2 HBA with PowerPath load balancing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to improve performance, from SAR statistics I can see a high %WIO, any ideia on how to improve this?:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;root@porsx005:/&amp;gt; sar -u&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP-UX porsx005 B.11.11 U 9000/800    01/26/06&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;00:00:00    %usr    %sys    %wio   %idle&lt;BR /&gt;00:20:00      13       3      47      38&lt;BR /&gt;00:40:01      12       3      63      22&lt;BR /&gt;01:00:00      32       3      47      18&lt;BR /&gt;01:20:00      32       5      56       7&lt;BR /&gt;01:40:01      22       6      69       4&lt;BR /&gt;02:00:00      22       3      53      22&lt;BR /&gt;02:20:00      32       3      46      19&lt;BR /&gt;02:40:01      19       4      66      11&lt;BR /&gt;03:00:00      37       3      40      20&lt;BR /&gt;03:20:00      29       3      62       7&lt;BR /&gt;03:40:00      20       5      70       5&lt;BR /&gt;04:00:00      43       4      49       4&lt;BR /&gt;04:20:00      29       5      56      10&lt;BR /&gt;04:40:00      23       4      72       1&lt;BR /&gt;05:00:02      13       3      73      11&lt;BR /&gt;05:20:02      26       4      58      12&lt;BR /&gt;05:40:00      12       3      61      24&lt;BR /&gt;06:00:00      20       3      54      23&lt;BR /&gt;06:20:03      27       3      44      25&lt;BR /&gt;06:40:00      29       5      48      18&lt;BR /&gt;07:00:00      19       3      56      22&lt;BR /&gt;07:20:09      34       5      55       5&lt;BR /&gt;07:40:00      42       4      39      15&lt;BR /&gt;08:00:00      43       4      34      19&lt;BR /&gt;08:20:01      35       3      30      31&lt;BR /&gt;08:40:00      48       4      42       6&lt;BR /&gt;09:00:00      63       5      29       3&lt;BR /&gt;09:20:00      69       4      26       1&lt;BR /&gt;09:40:00      60       4      33       2&lt;BR /&gt;10:00:00      48       4      42       6&lt;BR /&gt;10:20:00      63       4      23      10&lt;BR /&gt;10:40:00      44       3      47       5&lt;BR /&gt;11:00:00      46       4      46       3&lt;BR /&gt;11:20:00      25       3      51      20&lt;BR /&gt;11:40:00      21       5      53      21&lt;BR /&gt;12:00:00      26       4      53      17&lt;BR /&gt;12:20:00      29       3      59       8&lt;BR /&gt;12:40:00      15       3      62      19&lt;BR /&gt;13:00:00      23       3      51      23&lt;BR /&gt;13:20:00      45       3      25      27&lt;BR /&gt;13:40:00      16       3      50      32&lt;BR /&gt;14:00:00      26       3      61      10&lt;BR /&gt;14:20:00      50       4      35      11&lt;BR /&gt;14:40:00      22       4      56      18&lt;BR /&gt;15:00:00      44       5      38      13&lt;BR /&gt;15:20:00      68       8      24       0&lt;BR /&gt;15:40:00      35       7      54       4&lt;BR /&gt;16:00:00      29       6      53      12&lt;BR /&gt;16:20:00      26       2      33      38&lt;BR /&gt;16:40:00      22       3      51      24&lt;BR /&gt;17:00:00      28       3      43      26&lt;BR /&gt;17:20:00      28       3      28      42&lt;BR /&gt;17:40:00      15       4      54      27&lt;BR /&gt;18:00:00      36       5      53       6&lt;BR /&gt;18:20:01      33       3      41      24&lt;BR /&gt;18:40:00       8       3      47      42&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;root@porsx005:/&amp;gt; sar -w&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP-UX porsx005 B.11.11 U 9000/800    01/26/06&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;00:00:00 swpin/s bswin/s swpot/s bswot/s pswch/s&lt;BR /&gt;00:20:00    0.34     0.4    0.34     7.6    2018&lt;BR /&gt;00:40:01    0.67     0.0    0.75     0.1    2420&lt;BR /&gt;01:00:00    0.82     0.3    0.82     0.5    2550&lt;BR /&gt;01:20:00    0.88     0.3    0.83     0.1    4398&lt;BR /&gt;01:40:01    0.78     0.0    0.84     0.0    4227&lt;BR /&gt;02:00:00    0.96     0.3    0.97     9.1    1945&lt;BR /&gt;02:20:00    0.92     0.4    0.83     0.9    2638&lt;BR /&gt;02:40:01    0.22     0.5    0.22     0.0    2973&lt;BR /&gt;03:00:00    0.90     0.3    0.95     0.3    1880&lt;BR /&gt;03:20:00    0.68     0.2    0.72     0.4    2189&lt;BR /&gt;03:40:00    0.86     0.2    0.85    10.7    2945&lt;BR /&gt;04:00:00    0.83     0.6    0.84     1.1    2969&lt;BR /&gt;04:20:00    0.33     0.2    0.24     0.0    2868&lt;BR /&gt;04:40:00    0.59     0.1    0.70     0.2    3097&lt;BR /&gt;05:00:02    0.72     0.3    0.71     0.7    2204&lt;BR /&gt;05:20:02    0.89     0.7    0.89    12.6    2948&lt;BR /&gt;05:40:00    0.96     0.2    0.95     0.0    2331&lt;BR /&gt;06:00:00    0.39     0.0    0.30     0.0    2358&lt;BR /&gt;06:20:03    0.20     0.1    0.24     4.8    2242&lt;BR /&gt;06:40:00    0.96     0.3    1.00     0.4    4048&lt;BR /&gt;07:00:00    0.86     0.3    0.85     0.0    2247&lt;BR /&gt;07:20:09    0.90     0.3    0.90     1.0    4837&lt;BR /&gt;07:40:00    0.78     0.7    0.71    13.6    3390&lt;BR /&gt;08:00:00    0.02     0.0    0.02     0.0    3553&lt;BR /&gt;08:20:01    0.35     0.0    0.44     0.0    2442&lt;BR /&gt;08:40:00    0.64     0.8    0.64     8.6    3870&lt;BR /&gt;09:00:00    0.71     0.6    0.72     0.2    4949&lt;BR /&gt;09:20:00    0.95     0.6    0.95     0.0    5187&lt;BR /&gt;09:40:00    1.00     0.6    1.00     0.1    4002&lt;BR /&gt;10:00:00    0.81     0.1    0.80     0.0    3612&lt;BR /&gt;10:20:00    0.73     0.4    0.63     0.1    4293&lt;BR /&gt;10:40:00    0.00     0.0    0.00     0.0    3175&lt;BR /&gt;11:00:00    0.31     0.2    0.39     0.1    3686&lt;BR /&gt;11:20:00    0.49     0.1    0.43     0.0    2779&lt;BR /&gt;11:40:00    0.89     0.5    0.97     0.8    3036&lt;BR /&gt;12:00:00    0.80     0.2    0.79     0.0    2773&lt;BR /&gt;12:20:00    0.94     0.5    0.95     0.5    2996&lt;BR /&gt;12:40:00    0.94     0.3    0.92     0.0    2549&lt;BR /&gt;13:00:00    0.85     0.2    0.77     0.2    2778&lt;BR /&gt;13:20:00    0.68     0.3    0.68     0.0    3574&lt;BR /&gt;13:40:00    0.70     0.2    0.73     0.0    2078&lt;BR /&gt;14:00:00    0.74     0.1    0.80     0.0    2806&lt;BR /&gt;14:20:00    0.60     0.1    0.59     0.0    3176&lt;BR /&gt;14:40:00    0.75     0.3    0.67     0.2    3288&lt;BR /&gt;15:00:00    0.57     0.1    0.66     0.7    4809&lt;BR /&gt;15:20:00    0.98     0.6    0.99     3.3    8774&lt;BR /&gt;15:40:00    0.90     0.8    0.92     4.4    5933&lt;BR /&gt;16:00:00    0.40     0.4    0.28     0.0    5318&lt;BR /&gt;16:20:00    0.07     0.0    0.12     0.0    2169&lt;BR /&gt;16:40:00    0.71     0.2    0.78     0.8    2692&lt;BR /&gt;17:00:00    0.87     1.0    0.88     0.1    2706&lt;BR /&gt;17:20:00    0.98     0.0    0.98     0.0    2521&lt;BR /&gt;17:40:00    0.75     0.2    0.75     0.0    2847&lt;BR /&gt;18:00:00    0.96     0.3    0.92     0.4    3885&lt;BR /&gt;18:20:01    0.82     0.3    0.84     0.0    2513&lt;BR /&gt;18:40:00    0.62     0.2    0.52     0.0    1984&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Average     0.70     0.3    0.70     1.5    3259&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;mou&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thks&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pedro&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:45:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718307#M252265</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pedro Cirne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-26T13:45:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718308#M252266</link>
      <description>I sure hope you have Glance....&lt;BR /&gt;if not, you will have to use SAR to analyse the disk performance, per disk.&lt;BR /&gt;My guess is that PowerPath isn't doing its job, and all the I/O is going down the one path. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With PVLINKS, to fix this is easy:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;vgreduce the primary disk from the VG, then vgextend the VG again with the same disk. This fools the IO daemon and LVM into using the old secondary path disk as the new primary, and helps with load balancing over the fiber channels.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:24:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718308#M252266</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jakes Louw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T03:24:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718309#M252267</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Use sar -d to check which disk has a I/O problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you've Glance, you can see more info regarding your performance problem.&lt;BR /&gt;How is your Memory:&lt;BR /&gt;- swapinfo -tam&lt;BR /&gt;- iostat&lt;BR /&gt;- vmstat.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;GoodLuck&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Darrel</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718309#M252267</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darrel Louis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T03:32:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718310#M252268</link>
      <description>Your %wio isn't really that high...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That just means "idle with some process waiting for I/O"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Check &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sar -d 5 5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Look at avwait - should be less then 10...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds...Geoff</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 03:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718310#M252268</guid>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Wild</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T03:44:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718311#M252269</link>
      <description>Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Geof, sar -d 5 5:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t2d7   14.56    0.50     170    4112    0.00    0.89&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d0   11.00    0.50     188    3813    0.00    0.60&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d1   13.52    0.50     200    4729    0.00    0.72&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d2   14.40    0.50     213    4598    0.00    0.70&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d3   19.08    0.50     225    5341    0.00    0.91&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d4   16.00    0.50     221    5018    0.00    0.75&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d5   15.40    0.50     251    5852    0.00    0.65&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d6   19.00    0.50     267    6367    0.00    0.77&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t3d7   20.40    0.50     246    5094    0.00    0.89&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t4d0   14.16    0.50     260    5324    0.00    0.58&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c21t4d1   14.48    0.50     242    4820    0.00    0.61&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t2d7   13.36    0.50     163    3987    0.00    0.84&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d0   10.36    0.50     184    3761    0.00    0.59&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d1   13.40    0.50     201    4833    0.00    0.71&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d2   13.52    0.50     214    4445    0.00    0.66&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d3   18.28    0.50     223    5548    0.00    0.88&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d4   16.36    0.50     226    5026    0.00    0.76&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d5   16.00    0.50     268    6250    0.00    0.62&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d6   19.36    0.50     272    6406    0.00    0.77&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t3d7   20.28    0.50     249    4971    0.00    0.86&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t4d0   14.80    0.50     253    5275    0.00    0.62&lt;BR /&gt;Average   c23t4d1   13.28    0.50     240    4662    0.00    0.58&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So avwait is...... ZERO!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The "%idle" metric in SAR is not the same we can see at top, am I right? The "idle" metric in top considers CPU idle when waiting for I/O and in SAR this is not true?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pedro&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:03:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718311#M252269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pedro Cirne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T04:03:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718312#M252270</link>
      <description>More or less that sounds right.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With 0 await - looks like your server isn't really doing anything  :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good job.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;man sar gives some good info on what is displayed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds...Geoff</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:16:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718312#M252270</guid>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Wild</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T04:16:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718313#M252271</link>
      <description>hi pedro,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;First of all, You should take snap at different time intervals so as to be able to compare the values you are getting for the SAR command.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There is also the STATSPACK report which you can run which will clearly indicate where your application is suffering any performance problems. Again, snaps should be taken at different periods.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hope this helps too!&lt;BR /&gt;kind regards&lt;BR /&gt;yogeeraj</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:33:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718313#M252271</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yogeeraj_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T04:33:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718314#M252272</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try the performance script written by one of the forum members:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.hpux.ws/system.perf.sh" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.hpux.ws/system.perf.sh&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Use this to see if and where you've a bottleneck.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Darrel</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718314#M252272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darrel Louis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T04:46:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718315#M252273</link>
      <description>Hi Pedro :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here are some basic Oracle performamce scripts about buffer cache:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select (bbc.total_waits*100/(cg.value+dbg.value)) "Buff busy ratio ind. &amp;lt;= 0,007"&lt;BR /&gt;from v$system_event bbc,&lt;BR /&gt;v$sysstat cg,  v$sysstat dbg &lt;BR /&gt;where bbc.event='buffer busy waits'&lt;BR /&gt;and cg.name ='consistent gets' &lt;BR /&gt;and dbg.name='db block gets';&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select round(100 * sum(getmisses) / sum(gets), 2) "Misses Pct &amp;lt; 5%"&lt;BR /&gt;from   v$rowcache&lt;BR /&gt;having sum(gets) &amp;gt; 1000;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;O "hit ratio" a seguir deve ser entre 90% e 95%. Mais pode ser custoso. Pode ser menos em grandes e bem desenhadas BDs (clusters, etc...)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select (1-(sum(getmisses)/sum(gets))) * 100 "Hit Ratio"          &lt;BR /&gt;from v$rowcache;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eric Antunes</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718315#M252273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric Antunes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T06:28:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718316#M252274</link>
      <description>If you get those stats whilst loading data, then its a storage speed issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you get those stats whilst running queries, then I suggest you look at the indexing strategy in the DW itself, because it means that someone is doing lots of full table scans.  You can have many more indexes in a DW than OLTP system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may also look at table partitioning and parallel queries as a means to reduce scans.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:39:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718316#M252274</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Lewis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T06:39:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718317#M252275</link>
      <description>If you get those stats whilst loading data, then its a storage speed issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you get those stats whilst running queries, then I suggest you look at the indexing strategy in the DW itself, because it means that someone is doing lots of full table scans.  You can have many more indexes in a DW than OLTP system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You may also look at table partitioning, memory sort space and parallel queries as a means to reduce scans.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718317#M252275</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Lewis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T06:40:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Oracle Data Warehouse Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718318#M252276</link>
      <description>Pedro,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Monitor also the checkpoint frequency:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select value &lt;BR /&gt;from v$sysstat&lt;BR /&gt;where name like '%DBWR checkpoints%'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select &lt;VALUE_FROM_PREVIOUS_QUERY&gt; / (sysdate - startup_time) "Checkopints/Hour" from v$instance;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You should have from at least 1 to a maximum of 10 checkpoints per hour. Less or more than that is bad...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eric Antunes&lt;/VALUE_FROM_PREVIOUS_QUERY&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 07:17:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/oracle-data-warehouse-performance/m-p/3718318#M252276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric Antunes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-27T07:17:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

