topic Re: setting umask value in Operating System - HP-UX

setting umask value

sheevm — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:24:39 GMT

Hi,

One of the app developer is trying to aet umask value in his script to uamsk 077. But after running his profile, umask is still showing 022 default value.

The purpose is, the files created by this user must have umask of 077 (just for this user)

Can someone help?

Thanks
Rajim

Re: setting umask value

Steven E. Protter — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:29:58 GMT

Shalom,

The developer could just type:
umask 077

At the command prompt.

Developers being developers, you'll need to modify his/her profile.

Start with /etc/profile and then .profile and try to make this statement the last thing that happens when the profile gets sourced.

umask 077

Have a great day.

And ask yourself, what have you done to enable a helpless developer today.

SEP

Re: setting umask value

James R. Ferguson — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:31:36 GMT

Hi:

Given:

# cat ./mymask
umask 077

...if you do:

# ./mymask

...then the umask of your current environment will remain *unchanged*.

If you source (read) the script as:

# . ./mymask

...then the changed umask will be propogated and changed in the current environment.

Regards!

...JRF...

Re: setting umask value

A. Clay Stephenson — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 14:42:23 GMT

If your app developer doesn't understand the concept of child processes not being able to alter a parent processes environment then I'm not sure that this app developer should be developing apps yet. He is indeed setting umask but as soon as that process terminates and control is returned to the parent process, umask is exactly back to where it was.

There are really two options:
1) explicitly set umask in .profile
2) His script should be sourced in .profile by using the dot "." operator; sourcing a file makes the file part of the foreground process so that a child process is not involved. This sourced file must not contain an exit or return statement as that would have the effect of exiting the foreground process (the shell in this case).

Re: setting umask value

sheevm — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:10:18 GMT

Hi,

I tested this. The directory permission are O.K with the new umask 077. But if I touch file in that directory it does not have the same umask

Raji

Re: setting umask value

A. Clay Stephenson — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:18:07 GMT

Okay, let's do this:

umask 077
mkdir mynewdir
cd mynewdir
touch mynewfile
ls -l

I suspect that you will find that '.' the local directory has mode 700 (drwx------) and that mynewfile has mode 600 (-rw------) which is entirely consistant with a umask of 077.

Re: setting umask value

A. Clay Stephenson — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:29:24 GMT

I suspect what is confusing you is that with a umask of 077, directories are created with 700 permissions but regular files are created within the shell with 600 permissions. There are two things at play here: 1) the default creation mode of the file, and 2) the umask value. Umask "subtracts" from the creation mode to yield the effective mode. The operation isn't really subtraction; it's a NAND but you can kinda, sorta think of it as subtraction. The default creation mask for directories is 777 and the default creation mask for regular files is 666 and therefore the observed results make perfect sense.
In order to set the execute bit from within the shell, an explicit chmod is required after the file is created. In other languages (e.g. C,C++, or Perl) a one-step file creation with execute bit set is possible.

Re: setting umask value

sheevm — Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:39:47 GMT

Thanks. Just umask setting does not help the developr really. He has to use the chmod on the file.

Thanks again